The article seems to be published in JAMA network open, and as far as I can tell that publication is peer reviewed?
The article seems to be published in JAMA network open, and as far as I can tell that publication is peer reviewed?
gif.
But it has been peer reviewed? And the criteria have been defined?
What they're saying, as far as I can tell, is that after training the model on 85% of the dataset, the model predicted whether a participant had an ASD diagnosis (as a binary choice) 100% correctly for the remaining 15%. I don't think this is unheard of, but I'll agree that a replication would be nice to eliminate systemic errors. If the images from the ASD and TD sets were taken with different cameras, for instance, that could introduce an invisible difference in the datasets that an AI could converge on. I would expect them to control for stuff like that, though.
The board that fired him was that of the nonprofit, so they don't answer to shareholders.
Thanks, that was interesting. I kept thinking that this reads like something out of Quanta Magazine, and then at the end there was an attribution to them :)
To all the reflexive AI-downvoters: This is about an application of machine learning, not an LLM. Don't behave like an advanced autocomplete; think before you click :P
If you're logged in to lemmy.world, I think you can click the hamburger menu top right and then "Create community"?
Edit: sorry, just noticed your account is on programming.dev, where there's no such option? Then I'm afraid I don't know :/
Edit 2: From the programming.dev sidebar:
Community Creation
Communities in our instance are created from our community request zone. If you have an idea for a community that fits our instance that hasnt been made already feel free to create a post for it there. Communities will be considered for creation if theres enough interest in the idea shown by people upvoting it
My ISP gives me a warning about digital threats when I click this link, so either you have a quite impressive misconfiguration, or this is a noncredible fishing operation...
TASS reports that it happened in Tver Oblast northwest of Moscow.
The road is karma
Rome and Rome, Georgia
From TFA:
For ASD screening on the test set of images, the AI could pick out the children with an ASD diagnosis with a mean area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve of 1.00. AUROC ranges in value from 0 to 1. A model whose predictions are 100% wrong has an AUROC of 0.0; one whose predictions are 100% correct has an AUROC of 1.0, indicating that the AI’s predictions in the current study were 100% correct. There was no notable decrease in the mean AUROC, even when 95% of the least important areas of the image – those not including the optic disc – were removed.
They at least define how they get the 100% value, but I'm not an AIologist so I can't tell if it is reasonable.
Oh, the humanity!
He's not the one being charged.
...can't argue with that
Column A: yes
Column B: also yes
LemmySee? LemmyKnow? LemmyIn? 🙂
Ooh, what car is that?
Well, natural language processing is placed in the trough of disillusionment and projected to stay there for years. ChatGPT was released in November 2022...
kcatta evissaM
True, but as far as I can tell the AUROC measure they refer to incorporates both.
The image is from the article, but it shows the damage from the attack last year 😞
No step on Snek Island!
I think 140A has a 128 km range, 140B has a 165 km range but only ~300 submunitions.
Ok, maybe slightly :) but it surprises me that the ability to emulate a basic human is dismissed as "just statistics", since until a year ago it seemed like an impossible task...
Agree, I have definitely fallen for the temptation to say what sounds better, rather than what's exactly true... Less so in writing, possibly because it's less of a linear stream.
Nice, thanks!
Looks like an fpv drone?
Definitely possible, but we'll have to wait for some sort of replication (or lack of) to see, I guess.
Yeah, that's what I did. With my very light usage the fixed-price subscription isn't justifiable, but the api works nicely.
Thanks for posting, don't mind the downvotes from the luddites :D
Wait, again?
These subs all have home ports and can be observed when they leave, so that's probably not a big deal?
Yeah, I was probably a bit too caustic, and there's more to (A)GI than an LLM can achieve on its own, but I do believe that some, and perhaps a large, part of human consciousness works in a similar manner.
I also think that LLMs can have models of concepts, otherwise they couldn't do what they do. Probably also of truth and falsity, but perhaps with a lack of external grounding?
He did say "depravity"
Absolutely agree that this is a necessary next step!
*up bottoms
I don't know... admittedly, I only remember some vague bits from Tom Clancy novels, but didn't Soviet attack subs wait outside the home ports for the SSBNs to try to stay on their tail, and they never managed to?
I should dig up The Hunt for Red October, I guess, but given current geopolitics maybe Red Storm Rising is a better fit :)
And this tech community is being weirdly luddite over it as well, saying stuff like "it's only a bunch of statistics predicting what's best to say next". Guess what, so are you, sunshine.
Arrows
Pointless
Pick one