German government approves controlled legalization of cannabis usealphacyberranger@lemmy.world to World News@lemmy.world – 568 points – 1 years agomarca.com129Post a CommentPreviewYou are viewing a single commentView all commentsShow the parent commentGambling triggers the reward system. Is gambling physically addictive?THC triggers the reward system, gambling doesn't have a substance per seGambling absolutely triggers the brain's reward system. You have not provided a shred of evidence that cannabis is physically addictive. No medical studies whatsoever.THC is literally what makes marijuana psychoactive, and it triggers the reward system. Pretty sure that's physically addictiveBeing 'pretty sure' is not scientific evidence. You have none.I've literally linked you a source that says THC messes with the reward systemYes. And that is not the same as physical addiction. I already told you that. Your source does not prove your claim. I don't think you even read it. You do not go into withdrawal if you stop using cannabis even if you have used it for 20 years. If it was physically addictive, you would. It is simply not physically addictive. I don't know why it has to be physically addictive for you to have a problem with it, but it still isn't.If you don't think you go through drug withdrawal syndrome when leaving weed try not using it for a year, I insistAgain- feel free to present scientific evidence.https://americanaddictioncenters.org/withdrawal-timelines-treatments/weed-marijuanaOnce again, not a scientific paper. Also a website with a clear agenda.Unlike "Why weed should be legal", a news article cited in this same postI did not cite such an article, nor did I refer to it, so that isn't relevant. Tying me to something I had nothing to do with is also very dishonest. Why should I believe anything you have to say after that?4 more...4 more...4 more...4 more...4 more...4 more...4 more...4 more...4 more...4 more...4 more...4 more...4 more...
Gambling triggers the reward system. Is gambling physically addictive?THC triggers the reward system, gambling doesn't have a substance per seGambling absolutely triggers the brain's reward system. You have not provided a shred of evidence that cannabis is physically addictive. No medical studies whatsoever.THC is literally what makes marijuana psychoactive, and it triggers the reward system. Pretty sure that's physically addictiveBeing 'pretty sure' is not scientific evidence. You have none.I've literally linked you a source that says THC messes with the reward systemYes. And that is not the same as physical addiction. I already told you that. Your source does not prove your claim. I don't think you even read it. You do not go into withdrawal if you stop using cannabis even if you have used it for 20 years. If it was physically addictive, you would. It is simply not physically addictive. I don't know why it has to be physically addictive for you to have a problem with it, but it still isn't.If you don't think you go through drug withdrawal syndrome when leaving weed try not using it for a year, I insistAgain- feel free to present scientific evidence.https://americanaddictioncenters.org/withdrawal-timelines-treatments/weed-marijuanaOnce again, not a scientific paper. Also a website with a clear agenda.Unlike "Why weed should be legal", a news article cited in this same postI did not cite such an article, nor did I refer to it, so that isn't relevant. Tying me to something I had nothing to do with is also very dishonest. Why should I believe anything you have to say after that?4 more...4 more...4 more...4 more...4 more...4 more...4 more...4 more...4 more...4 more...4 more...4 more...4 more...
THC triggers the reward system, gambling doesn't have a substance per seGambling absolutely triggers the brain's reward system. You have not provided a shred of evidence that cannabis is physically addictive. No medical studies whatsoever.THC is literally what makes marijuana psychoactive, and it triggers the reward system. Pretty sure that's physically addictiveBeing 'pretty sure' is not scientific evidence. You have none.I've literally linked you a source that says THC messes with the reward systemYes. And that is not the same as physical addiction. I already told you that. Your source does not prove your claim. I don't think you even read it. You do not go into withdrawal if you stop using cannabis even if you have used it for 20 years. If it was physically addictive, you would. It is simply not physically addictive. I don't know why it has to be physically addictive for you to have a problem with it, but it still isn't.If you don't think you go through drug withdrawal syndrome when leaving weed try not using it for a year, I insistAgain- feel free to present scientific evidence.https://americanaddictioncenters.org/withdrawal-timelines-treatments/weed-marijuanaOnce again, not a scientific paper. Also a website with a clear agenda.Unlike "Why weed should be legal", a news article cited in this same postI did not cite such an article, nor did I refer to it, so that isn't relevant. Tying me to something I had nothing to do with is also very dishonest. Why should I believe anything you have to say after that?4 more...4 more...4 more...4 more...4 more...4 more...4 more...4 more...4 more...4 more...4 more...4 more...
Gambling absolutely triggers the brain's reward system. You have not provided a shred of evidence that cannabis is physically addictive. No medical studies whatsoever.THC is literally what makes marijuana psychoactive, and it triggers the reward system. Pretty sure that's physically addictiveBeing 'pretty sure' is not scientific evidence. You have none.I've literally linked you a source that says THC messes with the reward systemYes. And that is not the same as physical addiction. I already told you that. Your source does not prove your claim. I don't think you even read it. You do not go into withdrawal if you stop using cannabis even if you have used it for 20 years. If it was physically addictive, you would. It is simply not physically addictive. I don't know why it has to be physically addictive for you to have a problem with it, but it still isn't.If you don't think you go through drug withdrawal syndrome when leaving weed try not using it for a year, I insistAgain- feel free to present scientific evidence.https://americanaddictioncenters.org/withdrawal-timelines-treatments/weed-marijuanaOnce again, not a scientific paper. Also a website with a clear agenda.Unlike "Why weed should be legal", a news article cited in this same postI did not cite such an article, nor did I refer to it, so that isn't relevant. Tying me to something I had nothing to do with is also very dishonest. Why should I believe anything you have to say after that?4 more...4 more...4 more...4 more...4 more...4 more...4 more...4 more...4 more...4 more...4 more...
THC is literally what makes marijuana psychoactive, and it triggers the reward system. Pretty sure that's physically addictiveBeing 'pretty sure' is not scientific evidence. You have none.I've literally linked you a source that says THC messes with the reward systemYes. And that is not the same as physical addiction. I already told you that. Your source does not prove your claim. I don't think you even read it. You do not go into withdrawal if you stop using cannabis even if you have used it for 20 years. If it was physically addictive, you would. It is simply not physically addictive. I don't know why it has to be physically addictive for you to have a problem with it, but it still isn't.If you don't think you go through drug withdrawal syndrome when leaving weed try not using it for a year, I insistAgain- feel free to present scientific evidence.https://americanaddictioncenters.org/withdrawal-timelines-treatments/weed-marijuanaOnce again, not a scientific paper. Also a website with a clear agenda.Unlike "Why weed should be legal", a news article cited in this same postI did not cite such an article, nor did I refer to it, so that isn't relevant. Tying me to something I had nothing to do with is also very dishonest. Why should I believe anything you have to say after that?4 more...4 more...4 more...4 more...4 more...4 more...4 more...4 more...4 more...4 more...
Being 'pretty sure' is not scientific evidence. You have none.I've literally linked you a source that says THC messes with the reward systemYes. And that is not the same as physical addiction. I already told you that. Your source does not prove your claim. I don't think you even read it. You do not go into withdrawal if you stop using cannabis even if you have used it for 20 years. If it was physically addictive, you would. It is simply not physically addictive. I don't know why it has to be physically addictive for you to have a problem with it, but it still isn't.If you don't think you go through drug withdrawal syndrome when leaving weed try not using it for a year, I insistAgain- feel free to present scientific evidence.https://americanaddictioncenters.org/withdrawal-timelines-treatments/weed-marijuanaOnce again, not a scientific paper. Also a website with a clear agenda.Unlike "Why weed should be legal", a news article cited in this same postI did not cite such an article, nor did I refer to it, so that isn't relevant. Tying me to something I had nothing to do with is also very dishonest. Why should I believe anything you have to say after that?4 more...4 more...4 more...4 more...4 more...4 more...4 more...4 more...4 more...
I've literally linked you a source that says THC messes with the reward systemYes. And that is not the same as physical addiction. I already told you that. Your source does not prove your claim. I don't think you even read it. You do not go into withdrawal if you stop using cannabis even if you have used it for 20 years. If it was physically addictive, you would. It is simply not physically addictive. I don't know why it has to be physically addictive for you to have a problem with it, but it still isn't.If you don't think you go through drug withdrawal syndrome when leaving weed try not using it for a year, I insistAgain- feel free to present scientific evidence.https://americanaddictioncenters.org/withdrawal-timelines-treatments/weed-marijuanaOnce again, not a scientific paper. Also a website with a clear agenda.Unlike "Why weed should be legal", a news article cited in this same postI did not cite such an article, nor did I refer to it, so that isn't relevant. Tying me to something I had nothing to do with is also very dishonest. Why should I believe anything you have to say after that?4 more...4 more...4 more...4 more...4 more...4 more...4 more...4 more...
Yes. And that is not the same as physical addiction. I already told you that. Your source does not prove your claim. I don't think you even read it. You do not go into withdrawal if you stop using cannabis even if you have used it for 20 years. If it was physically addictive, you would. It is simply not physically addictive. I don't know why it has to be physically addictive for you to have a problem with it, but it still isn't.If you don't think you go through drug withdrawal syndrome when leaving weed try not using it for a year, I insistAgain- feel free to present scientific evidence.https://americanaddictioncenters.org/withdrawal-timelines-treatments/weed-marijuanaOnce again, not a scientific paper. Also a website with a clear agenda.Unlike "Why weed should be legal", a news article cited in this same postI did not cite such an article, nor did I refer to it, so that isn't relevant. Tying me to something I had nothing to do with is also very dishonest. Why should I believe anything you have to say after that?4 more...4 more...4 more...4 more...4 more...4 more...4 more...
If you don't think you go through drug withdrawal syndrome when leaving weed try not using it for a year, I insistAgain- feel free to present scientific evidence.https://americanaddictioncenters.org/withdrawal-timelines-treatments/weed-marijuanaOnce again, not a scientific paper. Also a website with a clear agenda.Unlike "Why weed should be legal", a news article cited in this same postI did not cite such an article, nor did I refer to it, so that isn't relevant. Tying me to something I had nothing to do with is also very dishonest. Why should I believe anything you have to say after that?4 more...4 more...4 more...4 more...4 more...4 more...
Again- feel free to present scientific evidence.https://americanaddictioncenters.org/withdrawal-timelines-treatments/weed-marijuanaOnce again, not a scientific paper. Also a website with a clear agenda.Unlike "Why weed should be legal", a news article cited in this same postI did not cite such an article, nor did I refer to it, so that isn't relevant. Tying me to something I had nothing to do with is also very dishonest. Why should I believe anything you have to say after that?4 more...4 more...4 more...4 more...4 more...
https://americanaddictioncenters.org/withdrawal-timelines-treatments/weed-marijuanaOnce again, not a scientific paper. Also a website with a clear agenda.Unlike "Why weed should be legal", a news article cited in this same postI did not cite such an article, nor did I refer to it, so that isn't relevant. Tying me to something I had nothing to do with is also very dishonest. Why should I believe anything you have to say after that?4 more...4 more...4 more...4 more...
Once again, not a scientific paper. Also a website with a clear agenda.Unlike "Why weed should be legal", a news article cited in this same postI did not cite such an article, nor did I refer to it, so that isn't relevant. Tying me to something I had nothing to do with is also very dishonest. Why should I believe anything you have to say after that?4 more...4 more...4 more...
Unlike "Why weed should be legal", a news article cited in this same postI did not cite such an article, nor did I refer to it, so that isn't relevant. Tying me to something I had nothing to do with is also very dishonest. Why should I believe anything you have to say after that?4 more...4 more...
I did not cite such an article, nor did I refer to it, so that isn't relevant. Tying me to something I had nothing to do with is also very dishonest. Why should I believe anything you have to say after that?4 more...
Gambling triggers the reward system. Is gambling physically addictive?
THC triggers the reward system, gambling doesn't have a substance per se
Gambling absolutely triggers the brain's reward system.
You have not provided a shred of evidence that cannabis is physically addictive. No medical studies whatsoever.
THC is literally what makes marijuana psychoactive, and it triggers the reward system. Pretty sure that's physically addictive
Being 'pretty sure' is not scientific evidence. You have none.
I've literally linked you a source that says THC messes with the reward system
Yes. And that is not the same as physical addiction. I already told you that. Your source does not prove your claim. I don't think you even read it.
You do not go into withdrawal if you stop using cannabis even if you have used it for 20 years. If it was physically addictive, you would.
It is simply not physically addictive.
I don't know why it has to be physically addictive for you to have a problem with it, but it still isn't.
If you don't think you go through drug withdrawal syndrome when leaving weed try not using it for a year, I insist
Again- feel free to present scientific evidence.
https://americanaddictioncenters.org/withdrawal-timelines-treatments/weed-marijuana
Once again, not a scientific paper. Also a website with a clear agenda.
Unlike "Why weed should be legal", a news article cited in this same post
I did not cite such an article, nor did I refer to it, so that isn't relevant.
Tying me to something I had nothing to do with is also very dishonest. Why should I believe anything you have to say after that?