San Francisco bakery sparks debate by refusing to serve armed police

stopthatgirl7@kbin.social to News@lemmy.world – 641 points –
independent.co.uk

Business says it doesn’t serve anyone who is armed

174

You are viewing a single comment

One is outright discrimination based on sexual orientation. The other is simply a policy applied to all patrons.

It should absolutely be legal to say 'no shoes no service' or 'has gun no service' even if it was not legal to discriminate based on sexual orientation/race/gender/etc. They aren't at all the same thing.

3 more...