Grindr’s Return-to-Office Ultimatum Has Gutted a Uniquely Queer Space in Tech
wired.com
Grindr’s Return-to-Office Ultimatum Has Gutted a Uniquely Queer Space in Tech::Two weeks after staff at queer dating app Grindr unionized, bosses ordered employees back to the office. Nearly half the app’s workers refused and have been laid off.
You are viewing a single comment
It's amazing how many of these big companies are suddenly coordinated on this return-to-office push. Do they all get together at their bunker/mansions in New Zealand to discuss these evil plans?
Probably Davos. But seriously, all those billionaires follow the same social calendar, and that includes stuff like Davos, the Monaco GP, Warren Buffett's party, etc, and I'm sure they all do get together to talk about stuff like that. The billionaires have class solidarity. Remember that time it came out the biggest 3 software firms had an agreement not to poach talent from each other, keeping wages artificially low?
Look at the line HR ALWAYS uses in salary negotiations. "We pay market rates"
The market rates never go up above market, because that would disrupt the same low wages they currently pay. Unless your role is indispensible in bringing in business (connections to other people who control market share or otherwise generate sales) your wage will consistently drop. The high earners are all commission and perfomance based.
"Worker" professionals like IT, mid-low tier HR, Finance, etc all get paid the same year after year at rates that rise way lower than inflation. It's common to see highly compensated individuals who make the same 1 million dollar salary year after year but their bonuses are a percentage of performance which is way above and beyond that base salary.
Bonus %s are always bigger the higher you go up in an org based on performance too, even for middle management. Why would that be? 10% of 100k is only 10k, but 50% of 500k is 250k. Screwed both ways per usual.
I mean, Andy Jassy did say a few weeks back that this is the stuff that CEO's have discussed together. It's a fucking stupid statement for a CEO of a huge company to make, because it points towards obvious collusion, but we are where we are.
It’d only be stupid if there were any chance they’d actually get in trouble.
Why would a CEO care about collusion? You're implying that they can't do whatever they want to.
Class solidarity is a big thing for the bourgeoisie, unfortunately it is nonexistent for the proletariat.
To put it in context, it's way easier to coordinate with 100 people than a 100M people.
They're certainly colluding to screw workers and consumers as much as possible. It benefits them to work together against the working class.