U.N. chief calls for an end to $7 trillion in fossil fuel subsidiesalphacyberranger@lemmy.world to World News@lemmy.world – 817 points – 10 months agocnbc.com27Post a CommentPreviewYou are viewing a single commentView all commentsShow the parent commentMass starvation is a price we're willing to pay. End the subsidies... /sGee whiz, you pretended to be me and said something I didn't say! I'm so owned right now!Mass starvation is indeed better than the extinction of mankind. What is the point of an economy if there is no one left to use it?Expensiver oil would lead to faster availlability of oecological alternative products to stuff made out of oil.
Mass starvation is a price we're willing to pay. End the subsidies... /sGee whiz, you pretended to be me and said something I didn't say! I'm so owned right now!Mass starvation is indeed better than the extinction of mankind. What is the point of an economy if there is no one left to use it?Expensiver oil would lead to faster availlability of oecological alternative products to stuff made out of oil.
Mass starvation is indeed better than the extinction of mankind. What is the point of an economy if there is no one left to use it?
Expensiver oil would lead to faster availlability of oecological alternative products to stuff made out of oil.
Mass starvation is a price we're willing to pay. End the subsidies... /s
Gee whiz, you pretended to be me and said something I didn't say! I'm so owned right now!
Mass starvation is indeed better than the extinction of mankind.
What is the point of an economy if there is no one left to use it?
Expensiver oil would lead to faster availlability of oecological alternative products to stuff made out of oil.