In your opinion, which FOSS software is by many considered "old" or "obsolete", but are in fact, in your opinion, in many ways better than the newer alternatives?

privsecfoss@feddit.dk to Free and Open Source Software@beehaw.org – 108 points –

I'll start:

  • RSS and blogs, news vs. social media
  • XMPP vs. WhatsApp/FB messenger/Snapchat
  • IRC vs. Matrix, Teams, Discord etc.
  • Forums vs. Social media, Reddit, Lemmy(?)
244

You are viewing a single comment

I see you, but man, I am of the exact opposite opinion. Configurability is, for me, a bug that needs to be fixed when it comes to desktop environments. It should be as standard as possible across machines.

A good DM need to strike a balance between configurability and ergonomy/ease of use.

As a novice user I loved to tweak the many configuration options, but it's time consuming and often lead to something worse than the default, leading to further tweaking.

Now I appreciate good defaults because that means there's few settings that needs tweaking.

Some DMs like early Gnome 3 releases went a bit too far removing configuration options, and have been slowly adding them back over several years.

It's also what creates a ton of bugs and problems, both for users and developers. People hate on Gnome for being very standard without a lot of config options, but it makes a 'standard' Gnome desktop possible in a way that just doesn't exist for KDE.