Russia ambassador warns U.S. resolution pushes for nuclear war over UkraineNightOwl@lemmy.fmhy.ml to World News@lemmy.ml – 19 points – 1 years agonewsweek.com22Post a CommentPreviewYou are viewing a single commentView all commentsShow the parent comment ..., dispersing radioactive contaminates into NATO territory... This you left out on purpose?yes, what with it not being one of the conditions for an "immediate response", and actually just being elaboration on the actual conditions thats why it says "or their proxies, or the destruction of a nuclear facility, dispersing radioactive contaminates into NATO territory" as opposed to "or their proxies, or the destruction of a nuclear facility, or dispersing radioactive contaminates into NATO territory" so sure, on purpose, that purpose being treating the text as if it says what it actually sayswhat? My point still stands NATO likes to sh*t but not to eat sh*t
..., dispersing radioactive contaminates into NATO territory... This you left out on purpose?yes, what with it not being one of the conditions for an "immediate response", and actually just being elaboration on the actual conditions thats why it says "or their proxies, or the destruction of a nuclear facility, dispersing radioactive contaminates into NATO territory" as opposed to "or their proxies, or the destruction of a nuclear facility, or dispersing radioactive contaminates into NATO territory" so sure, on purpose, that purpose being treating the text as if it says what it actually sayswhat? My point still stands NATO likes to sh*t but not to eat sh*t
yes, what with it not being one of the conditions for an "immediate response", and actually just being elaboration on the actual conditions thats why it says "or their proxies, or the destruction of a nuclear facility, dispersing radioactive contaminates into NATO territory" as opposed to "or their proxies, or the destruction of a nuclear facility, or dispersing radioactive contaminates into NATO territory" so sure, on purpose, that purpose being treating the text as if it says what it actually sayswhat? My point still stands NATO likes to sh*t but not to eat sh*t
This you left out on purpose?
yes, what with it not being one of the conditions for an "immediate response", and actually just being elaboration on the actual conditions
thats why it says "or their proxies, or the destruction of a nuclear facility, dispersing radioactive contaminates into NATO territory"
as opposed to "or their proxies, or the destruction of a nuclear facility, or dispersing radioactive contaminates into NATO territory"
so sure, on purpose, that purpose being treating the text as if it says what it actually says
what? My point still stands NATO likes to sh*t but not to eat sh*t