It also repeatedly calls this is a proxy war, which is simply not true based on, ya know, definitions of words.

Here's a guy who disagrees. But what does he know, he's just a former CIA Director and Secretary of Defense: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/videos/2022-03-17/u-s-is-in-a-proxy-war-with-russia-panetta-video

Now with fewer child mutilations! 👍

Ah yes, character assassination that doesn't address the content of the article -- which quotes journalists from mutliple outlets and doesn't involve Greenwald. A picture of unbiased, non-misleading discourse.

Can you give examples of the article's problems?

checks my own posting history

Looks fine to me. Oh wait, I'm linking to those well known pro-Russia and pro-China outlets, the Associated Press, Reuters, and the New York Times. Don't listen to me, I'll corrupt your soul with heterodox articles about publicly available government documents.