Not that I disagree, but how the hell is a "legal expert" any prerequisite for judging what a person's behavior says about them? That's more of psychologist's job, being a legal expert means as much as "the builder of the best sandcastle in the universe" in this case.
Not that it's very relevant to Trump, the only qualification required to analyze him is "being at least 5 year old of average intelligence". I just hate shitty titles, is all.
My guess is they get an understanding for how "guilty" vs "innocent" people act/react, but that would definitely just be anecdotal at best.
Not that I disagree, but how the hell is a "legal expert" any prerequisite for judging what a person's behavior says about them? That's more of psychologist's job, being a legal expert means as much as "the builder of the best sandcastle in the universe" in this case.
Not that it's very relevant to Trump, the only qualification required to analyze him is "being at least 5 year old of average intelligence". I just hate shitty titles, is all.
My guess is they get an understanding for how "guilty" vs "innocent" people act/react, but that would definitely just be anecdotal at best.
I understood that reference
Wtf is a dinosaurietogsubåt?
It's a dinosaur-train submarine.
Yes, I got that, but what is that?