What do you think is the most entertaining wikipedia article?ericbomb@lemmy.world to Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world – 134 points – 1 years ago41Post a CommentPreviewYou are viewing a single commentView all commentshttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homeopathy Never seen Wikipedia this judgemental before All relevant scientific knowledge about physics, chemistry, biochemistry and biology contradicts homeopathy Can you blame them? Quack medical pseudoscience gets people killed.“that’s what big pharma wants you to think” —too many people I knowI too think it is justified. Simply not used to this tone on Wikipedia. Which is why I find it funny.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homeopathy Never seen Wikipedia this judgemental before All relevant scientific knowledge about physics, chemistry, biochemistry and biology contradicts homeopathy Can you blame them? Quack medical pseudoscience gets people killed.“that’s what big pharma wants you to think” —too many people I knowI too think it is justified. Simply not used to this tone on Wikipedia. Which is why I find it funny.
All relevant scientific knowledge about physics, chemistry, biochemistry and biology contradicts homeopathy
Can you blame them? Quack medical pseudoscience gets people killed.“that’s what big pharma wants you to think” —too many people I knowI too think it is justified. Simply not used to this tone on Wikipedia. Which is why I find it funny.
I too think it is justified. Simply not used to this tone on Wikipedia. Which is why I find it funny.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homeopathy
Never seen Wikipedia this judgemental before
Can you blame them? Quack medical pseudoscience gets people killed.
“that’s what big pharma wants you to think”
—too many people I know
I too think it is justified. Simply not used to this tone on Wikipedia. Which is why I find it funny.