AOC accuses Republicans of making up evidence in Biden hearing

MicroWave@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world – 535 points –
AOC accuses Republicans of making up evidence in Biden hearing
theguardian.com

Questioning witnesses in the first impeachment hearing staged by House Republicans, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez prompted each to say they were not presenting “firsthand witness accounts” of crimes committed by Joe Biden.

The New York Democrat also accused Republicans of fabricating supposed evidence of corruption involving the president and his surviving son, Hunter Biden.

Republicans on the House oversight committee called three witnesses, Democrats one.

44

You are viewing a single comment

“Earlier today, one of our colleagues, the gentleman from Florida, presented up on the screen something that … appeared to be a screenshot of a text message containing or insinuating an explosive allegation.... That screenshot of what appeared to be a text message was a fabricated image.”

She caught them fabricating evidence in the hearing. They shopped a bubble around a section of a larger text to take it out of context and make it look like a standalone statement. She (read: her staff) went through the exhibits and found the actual quote with context that entirely changed the meaning of the statement.

And this is allowed because the congressmen who presented the "evidence" were not under oath, so they're allowed to completely doctor fake evidence?

In the days of yore, public figures cared about at least pretending to have integrity in the public eye. The system wasn't built with many safeguards against bad actors who do so publicly with zero sense of shame.

I have a contentious opinion. The system *was" built with safeguards against bad actors without shame. I think the founders assumed that dueling would serve that purpose. Anyone who was routinely obnoxious would end up getting killed eventually.

Bringing back dueling could potentially solve a lot of problems. We'll need ethical gunslingers by the dozens.

1 more...
2 more...
2 more...
2 more...

This is terrible reporting. Could the Guardian have shown the screenshot? Could they have asked what the context was? I don't understand why this all is behind a mostly opaque screen. Why we are being told something that obfuscates what was said rather than giving us the chance to judge for ourselves.

2 more...