Sunak proposes raising smoking age every year to create 'smoke-free' generationalphacyberranger@lemmy.world to World News@lemmy.world – 825 points – 12 months agonews.sky.com436Post a CommentPreviewYou are viewing a single commentView all commentsShow the parent commentI think you overestimate the size of these two groups. The group of people who care more about their own financials is likely a lot larger.Don't care thier fucking size. I care how loud these choads are and how many they might sway.Because the number of people voting for something is irrelevant? Yeah, makes sense.Not what I was saying.Then you're missing the point to begin with.And you don't have a good one.Maybe try practising your reading comprehension a bit more, then I'm sure you'll understand it eventually.Good luck eating and drinking money.I never said that I agreed with them.
I think you overestimate the size of these two groups. The group of people who care more about their own financials is likely a lot larger.Don't care thier fucking size. I care how loud these choads are and how many they might sway.Because the number of people voting for something is irrelevant? Yeah, makes sense.Not what I was saying.Then you're missing the point to begin with.And you don't have a good one.Maybe try practising your reading comprehension a bit more, then I'm sure you'll understand it eventually.Good luck eating and drinking money.I never said that I agreed with them.
Don't care thier fucking size. I care how loud these choads are and how many they might sway.Because the number of people voting for something is irrelevant? Yeah, makes sense.Not what I was saying.Then you're missing the point to begin with.And you don't have a good one.Maybe try practising your reading comprehension a bit more, then I'm sure you'll understand it eventually.
Because the number of people voting for something is irrelevant? Yeah, makes sense.Not what I was saying.Then you're missing the point to begin with.And you don't have a good one.Maybe try practising your reading comprehension a bit more, then I'm sure you'll understand it eventually.
Not what I was saying.Then you're missing the point to begin with.And you don't have a good one.Maybe try practising your reading comprehension a bit more, then I'm sure you'll understand it eventually.
Then you're missing the point to begin with.And you don't have a good one.Maybe try practising your reading comprehension a bit more, then I'm sure you'll understand it eventually.
And you don't have a good one.Maybe try practising your reading comprehension a bit more, then I'm sure you'll understand it eventually.
Maybe try practising your reading comprehension a bit more, then I'm sure you'll understand it eventually.
I think you overestimate the size of these two groups. The group of people who care more about their own financials is likely a lot larger.
Don't care thier fucking size.
I care how loud these choads are and how many they might sway.
Because the number of people voting for something is irrelevant? Yeah, makes sense.
Not what I was saying.
Then you're missing the point to begin with.
And you don't have a good one.
Maybe try practising your reading comprehension a bit more, then I'm sure you'll understand it eventually.
Good luck eating and drinking money.
I never said that I agreed with them.