the internet is worse.sbg@lemmy.world to Mildly Infuriating@lemmy.world – 1267 points – 9 months ago132Post a CommentPreviewYou are viewing a single commentView all comments12ft.io is your friendOr disabling js. Most of you use ublock origin. Ublock has a setting to disable JavaScript and you can whitelist sites you want jsDisabling js does not bypass these article limits, idk why this is being upvoted.On some websites it does. For example, it's worked for me on newyorktimesTrue, but that's yet another step every time I want to read an article. Personally i just use ublock origin and add this custom filter list. And yeah, you can also turn off JS to accomplish a lot while browsing the internet.They're not asking to get around it, they're pointing out shitty practices that are common now.People don't want to pay, but they also don't want to see ads. How does everyone think these companies are going to afford to operate?Ad revenue. Doesn't matter if people don't like to see them lol
12ft.io is your friendOr disabling js. Most of you use ublock origin. Ublock has a setting to disable JavaScript and you can whitelist sites you want jsDisabling js does not bypass these article limits, idk why this is being upvoted.On some websites it does. For example, it's worked for me on newyorktimesTrue, but that's yet another step every time I want to read an article. Personally i just use ublock origin and add this custom filter list. And yeah, you can also turn off JS to accomplish a lot while browsing the internet.They're not asking to get around it, they're pointing out shitty practices that are common now.People don't want to pay, but they also don't want to see ads. How does everyone think these companies are going to afford to operate?Ad revenue. Doesn't matter if people don't like to see them lol
Or disabling js. Most of you use ublock origin. Ublock has a setting to disable JavaScript and you can whitelist sites you want jsDisabling js does not bypass these article limits, idk why this is being upvoted.On some websites it does. For example, it's worked for me on newyorktimes
Disabling js does not bypass these article limits, idk why this is being upvoted.On some websites it does. For example, it's worked for me on newyorktimes
True, but that's yet another step every time I want to read an article. Personally i just use ublock origin and add this custom filter list. And yeah, you can also turn off JS to accomplish a lot while browsing the internet.
They're not asking to get around it, they're pointing out shitty practices that are common now.People don't want to pay, but they also don't want to see ads. How does everyone think these companies are going to afford to operate?Ad revenue. Doesn't matter if people don't like to see them lol
People don't want to pay, but they also don't want to see ads. How does everyone think these companies are going to afford to operate?Ad revenue. Doesn't matter if people don't like to see them lol
12ft.io is your friend
Or disabling js. Most of you use ublock origin. Ublock has a setting to disable JavaScript and you can whitelist sites you want js
Disabling js does not bypass these article limits, idk why this is being upvoted.
On some websites it does. For example, it's worked for me on newyorktimes
True, but that's yet another step every time I want to read an article. Personally i just use ublock origin and add this custom filter list.
And yeah, you can also turn off JS to accomplish a lot while browsing the internet.
They're not asking to get around it, they're pointing out shitty practices that are common now.
People don't want to pay, but they also don't want to see ads. How does everyone think these companies are going to afford to operate?
Ad revenue. Doesn't matter if people don't like to see them lol