I watched Hamas unleash hell

Bernie Ecclestoned@sh.itjust.works to World News@lemmy.world – 18 points –
I watched Hamas unleash hell
unherd.com
31

You are viewing a single comment

There was a chance of a two state solution, a lot of effort was put in, Yasser Arafat is widely blamed for walking away. They chose to continue to commit to genocide. Ironic eh?

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2002/may/23/israel3

Widely blamed by whom? The West?

At the failed Camp David summit, Arafat was ambushed by Clinton and Barak, when both presented him with a deal that was much more favorable to Israel than to Palestine. Source.

But facts don’t matter to you. Ironic eh?

The proposals included the establishment of a demilitarised Palestinian state on some 92% of the West Bank and 100% of the Gaza Strip, with some territorial compensation for the Palestinians from pre-1967 Israeli territory; the dismantling of most of the settlements and the concentration of the bulk of the settlers inside the 8% of the West Bank to be annexed by Israel; the establishment of the Palestinian capital in east Jerusalem, in which some Arab neighborhoods would become sovereign Palestinian territory and others would enjoy "functional autonomy"; Palestinian sovereignty over half the Old City of Jerusalem (the Muslim and Christian quarters) and "custodianship," though not sovereignty, over the Temple Mount; a return of refugees to the prospective Palestinian state though with no "right of return" to Israel proper; and the organisation by the international community of a massive aid programme to facilitate the refugees' rehabilitation.

Ambushed with the best deal ever. Sure.

Sorry you typed all that in vain. If you’re trying to convince me, you’re gonna need to grant all Palestinians equal rights, and withdraw settlements from all occupied areas. If you want a 2 state; we go back to the 1967 borders and conditions. Deal?

It's a quote... from the link you didn't read

You comment like Israel negotiates: One-Sided. And then become indignant when the other side disagrees.

You just disagreed without reading the details, there's no point arguing with someone who doesn't know the details

Good luck defending the indefensible. Btw, I did read it.

And yet you defend a terror attack where women are raped and children burned alive?

Good luck with that 🤡

Just found out that’s not true. I don’t need luck, I have truth, and the right side of history.

Wow you swallow propaganda without even chewing, GG!

The link in your 'source' doesn't match the claim...

Also by the same author

The Israeli regime was not the victim on October 7. The Hamas offensive bears no resemblance to the September 11 attacks of 2001 and the Palestinian resistance has nothing in common with Daesh or other takfiri terrorists. The only thing that was out of the ordinary for the conflict in Palestine on October 7, was that for once the fight was taken to the Israelis and instead of it being dead Palestinians, it was dead Israeli soldiers and settlers.

https://english.almayadeen.net/articles/analysis/the-israeli-victim-narrative-about-october-7-is-based-on-wes

🤡

1 more...
1 more...
1 more...
1 more...
1 more...
1 more...
1 more...
1 more...
1 more...
1 more...
1 more...