Read your own link. There's nothing resembling a contract here, and even your own link says this doesn't apply given the amount of money involved.
Sit down.
which link says that? i suspect you didn't even bother to click on it, did you?
The first one that Google literally highlights, if you click it, it says that verbal contracts are binding but purchases of goods over $500 is an exception.
If you're not talking about the first search result, maybe link to an actual source instead of the search results.
It's also only a contact if two parties agree. Has the Wikimedia foundation even replied to this malarkey?
The very first one.
But of course now you've tipped your hand that you didn't even have a source in mind and literally just googled it without clicking a single result.
Absolutely not.
and you know that, or are you mistaking your thoughts and wishes with facts?
https://www.google.com/search?q=is+verbal+promise+legally+binding+in+usa
Read your own link. There's nothing resembling a contract here, and even your own link says this doesn't apply given the amount of money involved.
Sit down.
which link says that? i suspect you didn't even bother to click on it, did you?
The first one that Google literally highlights, if you click it, it says that verbal contracts are binding but purchases of goods over $500 is an exception.
If you're not talking about the first search result, maybe link to an actual source instead of the search results.
It's also only a contact if two parties agree. Has the Wikimedia foundation even replied to this malarkey?
The very first one.
But of course now you've tipped your hand that you didn't even have a source in mind and literally just googled it without clicking a single result.
Seriously, sit down.