Second teacher at Missouri school on leave over OnlyFans side hustle: 'It’s working out ok so far'
news.yahoo.com
A second teacher at a high school in Missouri was put on leave after administrators discovered her OnlyFans side hustle.
Megan Gaither, 31, said during an interview with the St. Louis Post-Dispatch that she was placed on leave from her English teaching and varsity cheerleading coach position on Oct. 27 after district officials found out about her account on the OnlyFans platform.
You are viewing a single comment
L take and completely wrong. Fuck people for not only judging for something harmless, but also for directly impacting her life because of it when she didn't impact anyone else's.
What part am I wrong about? Her OF account has clearly affected her job as a teacher. The evidence of what I said is right there. You're in denial of facts of what has already occurred. If she didn't see this coming, she's stupid.
I don't care if you think people shouldn't be judgmental. You're being judgement of me right now. And I am of you right now. People always are, always have been and always will. That's how humans work. Your denial or calling it out as bad is irrelevant in your ability to plan for the future.
Edit: Let me be clear. I am not defending the judgmental. I am pointing out the lack of social understanding.
In that same vain then, I shouldn't dress "slutty" in public otherwise I'm just asking to get raped right? Get fucked.
Because you couldn't point out what was wrong, you decided to take a strawman? No, that is not the same vain. The logic isn't consistent.
It would be: If she doesn't want to get raped, she should take precautions based on the risks involved.
If this teacher doesn't want to be fired, she should understand that there are risks that follow her actions.
If I follow your logic, the statement of the teacher would become:
She must've wanted to get fired, so she did OF. No, the predicate the consequences are backwards.
Being stupid is not a defense. And your argument is illogical.
She must have wanted to be raped or she wouldn't have dressed like that.
No, that is not the same vain. The logic isn't consistent.
It would be: If she doesn't want to get raped, she should take precautions based on the risks involved.
If this teacher doesn't want to be fired, she should understand that there are risks that follow her actions.
If I follow your logic, the statement of the teacher would become:
She must've wanted to get fired, so she did OF. No, the predicate the consequences are backwards.
Being stupid is not a defense. And your argument is illogical.
Victim blaming and I don't think you know how logic works.
I did not victim blame. I wish logic and/or discrete mathematics is a requirement education in the world. Then we wouldn't be having this conversation.
You did.