What's new in Fedora Workstation 39

Leo@lemmy.linuxuserspace.show to Linux@lemmy.ml – 109 points –
What's new in Fedora Workstation 39 - Fedora Magazine
fedoramagazine.org
41

You are viewing a single comment

This is why I hate Linux fanatics. They think everything that isn't Foss is malware or something. I've been using Fedora for months now and it was my first time using Linux. Is probably the most modern and best working distro right now. Like it or not is amazing, and with 39 it's even smother. Never had any problems, works perfect with Gnome and nothing has ever broken. Even games play just like in windows with a bit of tweaking in proton. You should maybe try things first and not be so paranoid about Red Hat. It's a company just like many others. You think Arch or Mint wouldn't become just like Red Hat if they had the user's numbers? This world is all about money, so stop complaining and just let people enjoy

I’ve been using Fedora for months now and it was my first time using Linux. Is probably the most modern and best working distro right now.

I'm not gonna suggest to you to switch distros or whatever. But most of the modern feeling you are seeing is just the DE, which you can use whichever one with whatever distro. As far as Fedora's own stack the centerpiece which is the package manager is actually really slow comparing with anything else.

You think Arch or Mint wouldn’t become just like Red Hat if they had the user’s numbers?

Yeah. They wouldn't. I think they actually already do have higher number of users than fedora actually. If they don't, then Debian surely does.

Red Hat is a for profit company, and their first goal will always be that even if that means squeezing you and making the experience worse for you.

Community distros are explicitly about the community and not about profit, and it works quite well.

Red Hat's business is mostly in servers and service to host for companies. Fedora is a side project at most. That's why I find it funny that people think Red Hat is going to destroy Linux or something. My point was that companies want to make money, and if a distro becomes really really popular is inevitable that sooner or later some kind of corporation will put it's hands on it.

I know Fedora is mostly just Gnome, but you can't deny it's probably the best implementation of it in any distro. I tried KDE and wasn't for me. I got used to gnome's workflow real quick, I have trouble using Windows even. And Arch is definitely not easy to install for a newbie. Idk, I guess all this drama with Fedora is just pointless to me

if a distro becomes really really popular is inevitable that sooner or later some kind of corporation will put it’s hands on it.

Not how it works. And more so in general if you're interested and curious do some reading on copyleft licenses. It's truly a marvelous thing and they work quite well at keeping projects open.

I know Fedora is mostly just Gnome, but you can’t deny it’s probably the best implementation of it in any distro.

I absolutely can, what. It's about the same as all other distros that don't add much or at all to the upstream version.

And Arch is definitely not easy to install for a newbie.

If you are interested in trying it some time, once you're in the installer type "archinstall". It's a default installation script that makes it easy to install. There isn't nearly as much upkeep as the memes would suggest.

I tried archinstall. It's still not easy, specially if you are not very well versed in os installs. As long as Fedora works it will be fine for me.

In any case, whatever you install will be better than Microsoft's Windows, now thats a predatory company! I'll never go back to Windows. And maybe in the future I will try my luck with another distro

Fedora IS the most modern distro. First to adopt pipewire, systemd, enables flatpaks by default and btrfs. Probably other things I don't know. Being first is one of their core goals

Afaik, Fedora is a free software. I don't deny that, and I'm a free software fan. I don't have any problems with fedora besides that it is too heavy for me.

It looks you also care about your freedom because you use gnu/linux and lemmy. However, it seems you have a different meaning of malware.

Softwere is a recipe. Any unwanted step is malicious. You can only determine a step as unwanted by seeing its source code.

Besides this, a softwere can have other functions that are not coming from the code but the license. Similarly they can be malfunctions. For example preventing you from modification.

So yes, propriatory software is malware. I use some malwares also, because they have no alternatives yet. But let me call them malwares.

Copyright is the example of capitalism polluting water to be able to sell clean water to people.

10 more...