There's a certain demographic of people who crave a constant flow of outrage to fuel their social media addiction. I know because I've struggled with this myself.
Reddit has a slew of bots and artificially promoted posts to provide this to increase engagement.
I guess we have bots here too, but it's trivial to block them, and obvious spam/ads tend to be removed on sight.
There's far less outrage fuel here than on reddit, and also the comparatively slower flow of content encourages actual engagement and participation vs. merely consuming.
I can see why someone who's balls deep in reddit might be disappointed here.
I may also be completely wrong about some of this, but that's my observational take.
As someone who went from a daily user of reddit for a decade and now hasn't used reddit basically since the app's red wedding, I really don't think this is it. As much as I hope the fediverse and Lemmy take off, currently I'm extremely pessimistic about that because if anything the problem is the reverse of what you describe. My current front page on Lemmy (all/active):
an article whining about Elon
an article about Fox News/trump
a post complaining about charging for XBL/PSN
an article about Tesla being banned from driving schools
an article complaining about DoorDash
and so on. And to get to this great non-rage bait content, I had to go through the trouble of even figuring out how to use the fediverse and which instance to sign up for (and then still hop instances a few times) and spend my first week just blocking like I was getting paid for it because language settings on this site mean nothing, more or less, and there are a few "communities" that pop up here that provide all of the intellectual stimulation of jamming a q-tip too far in your ear.
And if those posts alone don't paint a clear picture about who the user base is here, heading to the comments will. Most of the comments read like they're posted by "lefty white linux bro" or "communist trans linux they/them" who have decided that those are their entire identity/personality. While none of those things are bad and I tick a lot of those boxes myself, it creates a real echo chamber that borders on hostile to anyone that isn't in that category. The other side effect I've seen on this is that this place can offer up some real doozies of takes in a way that is likely to make anyone who actually knows anything just up and leave. I saw one the other day that was talking about greatest people in the FOSS space and uncritically lists RMS that was heavily upvoted. At least someone brought up why that's problematic in the comments, but imagine hopping over to the mainstream sites and talking about best musicians and seeing R Kelly on the list...
Anyway, while I don't mind an echo chamber now and then, if Lemmy in particular is to grow and be useful for anyone outside of this base, I'd suggest the community adopt something closer akin to "reddiquette" which is probably the main reason why reddit was able to get somewhat past this in the early days, and some of the "niche" communities were able to grow. I put niche in quotes here, because as it stands now Lemmy doesn't have even very vibrant communities for fairly mainstream things (music and TV, movies, etc.)
So while I personally choose to spend my time here instead of on reddit, that's mostly an ideological choice and I view as a sacrifice because I'm missing out on tons of other content that I enjoy. Even your post is a form of this – "reddit bad" (sure) "because of bots" (also sure) "and Lemmy has less outrage content and fuels engagement" (uh, no.) Lemmy has as much or more, and it's only fueling engagement on those that don't immediately bounce off, but since you posted "their team bad, our team good" you're getting upvotes and probably will continue to.
That you accuse leftists and marginalized groups of "mAkInG iT ThEiR wHoLe IdEnTiTy" tells me everything I need to know about your privilege and worldview, and explains immediately why you'd prefer reddit, a notorious alt-right platform.
We're generally not welcome on reddit, so the fact that bigots and transphobes or right-wingers get immediately dunked on here is actually a good feature, and makes this far less toxic overall.
FYI I've blocked you, so I won't see any further hot takes from you and therefore won't respond. My time and sanity are far too valuable to waste on someone like you.
Ah perfect. Sets up a strawman, completely misses the point of my post, says one of the dumbest things I've ever heard (reddit being an alt-right website*) and then immediately moves to block in response to me saying this place is a hostile echo chamber. 10/10, no notes, illustrates the point I was trying to make better than I did.
Just to be clear for other readers, I was not saying that any of those things are bad I was saying that this place has a purity test that borders on stupidity which this post illustrates well.
* just how does one come to this conclusion? It's less lefty than Lemmy, but not by much. It's alt-right communities are usually either banned, quarantined, and regardless of the technicals of the website or how the admins run it, they've always been outcast and if you say "vote for trump" in any but the clearly right echo chambers, you're going to get downvoted to hell.
It's fine for actual bigots to get dunked on. But Lemmy users will dunk on you: literally for liking the "wrong" piece of software. The echo chamber is real.
I've not noticed. Can you provide an example? You mean Chrome?
Honestly, I wish more people would switch to Firefox, but I'd never dunk on someone for Chrome. I might try to talk them out of it though lol
There's a certain demographic of people who crave a constant flow of outrage to fuel their social media addiction. I know because I've struggled with this myself.
Reddit has a slew of bots and artificially promoted posts to provide this to increase engagement.
I guess we have bots here too, but it's trivial to block them, and obvious spam/ads tend to be removed on sight.
There's far less outrage fuel here than on reddit, and also the comparatively slower flow of content encourages actual engagement and participation vs. merely consuming.
I can see why someone who's balls deep in reddit might be disappointed here.
I may also be completely wrong about some of this, but that's my observational take.
As someone who went from a daily user of reddit for a decade and now hasn't used reddit basically since the app's red wedding, I really don't think this is it. As much as I hope the fediverse and Lemmy take off, currently I'm extremely pessimistic about that because if anything the problem is the reverse of what you describe. My current front page on Lemmy (all/active):
and so on. And to get to this great non-rage bait content, I had to go through the trouble of even figuring out how to use the fediverse and which instance to sign up for (and then still hop instances a few times) and spend my first week just blocking like I was getting paid for it because language settings on this site mean nothing, more or less, and there are a few "communities" that pop up here that provide all of the intellectual stimulation of jamming a q-tip too far in your ear.
And if those posts alone don't paint a clear picture about who the user base is here, heading to the comments will. Most of the comments read like they're posted by "lefty white linux bro" or "communist trans linux they/them" who have decided that those are their entire identity/personality. While none of those things are bad and I tick a lot of those boxes myself, it creates a real echo chamber that borders on hostile to anyone that isn't in that category. The other side effect I've seen on this is that this place can offer up some real doozies of takes in a way that is likely to make anyone who actually knows anything just up and leave. I saw one the other day that was talking about greatest people in the FOSS space and uncritically lists RMS that was heavily upvoted. At least someone brought up why that's problematic in the comments, but imagine hopping over to the mainstream sites and talking about best musicians and seeing R Kelly on the list...
Anyway, while I don't mind an echo chamber now and then, if Lemmy in particular is to grow and be useful for anyone outside of this base, I'd suggest the community adopt something closer akin to "reddiquette" which is probably the main reason why reddit was able to get somewhat past this in the early days, and some of the "niche" communities were able to grow. I put niche in quotes here, because as it stands now Lemmy doesn't have even very vibrant communities for fairly mainstream things (music and TV, movies, etc.)
So while I personally choose to spend my time here instead of on reddit, that's mostly an ideological choice and I view as a sacrifice because I'm missing out on tons of other content that I enjoy. Even your post is a form of this – "reddit bad" (sure) "because of bots" (also sure) "and Lemmy has less outrage content and fuels engagement" (uh, no.) Lemmy has as much or more, and it's only fueling engagement on those that don't immediately bounce off, but since you posted "their team bad, our team good" you're getting upvotes and probably will continue to.
That you accuse leftists and marginalized groups of "mAkInG iT ThEiR wHoLe IdEnTiTy" tells me everything I need to know about your privilege and worldview, and explains immediately why you'd prefer reddit, a notorious alt-right platform.
We're generally not welcome on reddit, so the fact that bigots and transphobes or right-wingers get immediately dunked on here is actually a good feature, and makes this far less toxic overall.
FYI I've blocked you, so I won't see any further hot takes from you and therefore won't respond. My time and sanity are far too valuable to waste on someone like you.
Ah perfect. Sets up a strawman, completely misses the point of my post, says one of the dumbest things I've ever heard (reddit being an alt-right website*) and then immediately moves to block in response to me saying this place is a hostile echo chamber. 10/10, no notes, illustrates the point I was trying to make better than I did.
Just to be clear for other readers, I was not saying that any of those things are bad I was saying that this place has a purity test that borders on stupidity which this post illustrates well.
* just how does one come to this conclusion? It's less lefty than Lemmy, but not by much. It's alt-right communities are usually either banned, quarantined, and regardless of the technicals of the website or how the admins run it, they've always been outcast and if you say "vote for trump" in any but the clearly right echo chambers, you're going to get downvoted to hell.
It's fine for actual bigots to get dunked on. But Lemmy users will dunk on you: literally for liking the "wrong" piece of software. The echo chamber is real.
I've not noticed. Can you provide an example? You mean Chrome?
Honestly, I wish more people would switch to Firefox, but I'd never dunk on someone for Chrome. I might try to talk them out of it though lol
You perfectly illustrated the point
The "point"