'Gun-loving' GOP governor reportedly seen 'running scared for his life' from mass shooting

some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org to News@lemmy.world – 897 points –
'Gun-loving' GOP governor reportedly seen 'running scared for his life' from mass shooting
rawstory.com

Run, you fucking piece of shit. Go go go gogogogogogog!

My niece told her grandmother about her fear of getting murdered at school. Feel that fear, asshole.

271

You are viewing a single comment

Do you support them being legal and almost entirely unregulated? Because that is the GOP position and there is a big gulf between the two.

I have no problem with guns being legal. Unlike Republicans, though, I don't want them in the hands of, for example, the criminally insane.

I do support unregulated guns, but I am willing to compromise. Right now guns are extremely regulated particularly in some states, which is wrong. I think the biggest problem is that the regulations that some people want are ineffective at best.

I do support unregulated guns

Really? So guns for toddlers? Guns for people who have been institutionalized multiple times? Guns for people who have committed treasonous acts?

A former school shooter gets out of prison- give them a gun?

Guns for people who have committed treasonous acts?

This is the exact reason I support unregulated gun use, because people can claim things and then people lose rights.

Right, so you think clinically insane people and toddlers should have guns.

I think the only valid point you have is that insane people shouldnt have guns; toddlers parents should be in charge of what they have access to. So if you proposition is that we only limit guns to insane people, I agree to this compromise.

toddlers parents should be in charge of what they have access to.

Got it. Parents get to decide whether or not toddlers should have access to drugs.

Strawman

Nope, logical inference based on what you said.

Or does "toddlers parents should be in charge of what they have access to" mean something non-literal? Was it metaphorical? I doubt it.

If you're going to make sweeping general statements that apply in every situation, that's not my fault.

Nope, drugs are directly harmful, a child could hold and carry an unloaded weapon with no issue. Or they could shoot a gun that shoots something non lethal.

I said 'access,' not 'use.' A toddler cannot be harmed by picking up a bag of meth any more than they can be harmed by an unloaded weapon.

So it's okay to let them do that, right?

A toddler cannot be harmed by picking up a bag of meth any more than they can be harmed by an unloaded weapon.

Of course they can... Have you not noticed how cops wear gloves when they deal with drugs, the residue on a bag could literally kill someone.

But if your gun control counter negotiation is no toddlers or insane with guns, I will accept that counter offer.

Yes, I have noticed that cops buy into all kinds of propaganda bullshit about drugs.

And apparently so do you.

Cops also pass out when they touch a tiny bit of fentanyl despite fentanyl not being able to be absorbed by the skin that quickly or easily.

9 more...
9 more...
9 more...
9 more...
9 more...
9 more...
9 more...
9 more...
9 more...
9 more...
9 more...
9 more...
9 more...