Israel Gaza: China condemns US veto of call for immediate ceasefire at UN - BBCTukma@lemmy.cafe to News@lemmy.world – 141 points – 4 months agobbc.com20Post a CommentPreviewYou are viewing a single commentView all commentsShow the parent commentYou say it makes no sense to stop murdering Palestinian children unless Hamas releases hostages. Like, shooting children is a no-brainer. What makes you or Netanyahu any better than Hamas? Literally nothing.No, I said there was no logic to calling for a ceasefire without addressing hostages.It makes lots of sense. With a ceasefire Israel will stop shooting and blowing up their own hostages to be rescued.That is not logical, that is your own fantasy.Reuter's is my personal fantasy? Wow okay zionist.At least I knew the word zionist before October 7th and know what it means. It's not really a pejorative.You act like you were the only one. But then again, that's not the only thing you're wrong about.
You say it makes no sense to stop murdering Palestinian children unless Hamas releases hostages. Like, shooting children is a no-brainer. What makes you or Netanyahu any better than Hamas? Literally nothing.No, I said there was no logic to calling for a ceasefire without addressing hostages.It makes lots of sense. With a ceasefire Israel will stop shooting and blowing up their own hostages to be rescued.That is not logical, that is your own fantasy.Reuter's is my personal fantasy? Wow okay zionist.At least I knew the word zionist before October 7th and know what it means. It's not really a pejorative.You act like you were the only one. But then again, that's not the only thing you're wrong about.
No, I said there was no logic to calling for a ceasefire without addressing hostages.It makes lots of sense. With a ceasefire Israel will stop shooting and blowing up their own hostages to be rescued.That is not logical, that is your own fantasy.Reuter's is my personal fantasy? Wow okay zionist.At least I knew the word zionist before October 7th and know what it means. It's not really a pejorative.You act like you were the only one. But then again, that's not the only thing you're wrong about.
It makes lots of sense. With a ceasefire Israel will stop shooting and blowing up their own hostages to be rescued.That is not logical, that is your own fantasy.Reuter's is my personal fantasy? Wow okay zionist.At least I knew the word zionist before October 7th and know what it means. It's not really a pejorative.You act like you were the only one. But then again, that's not the only thing you're wrong about.
That is not logical, that is your own fantasy.Reuter's is my personal fantasy? Wow okay zionist.At least I knew the word zionist before October 7th and know what it means. It's not really a pejorative.You act like you were the only one. But then again, that's not the only thing you're wrong about.
Reuter's is my personal fantasy? Wow okay zionist.At least I knew the word zionist before October 7th and know what it means. It's not really a pejorative.You act like you were the only one. But then again, that's not the only thing you're wrong about.
At least I knew the word zionist before October 7th and know what it means. It's not really a pejorative.You act like you were the only one. But then again, that's not the only thing you're wrong about.
You say it makes no sense to stop murdering Palestinian children unless Hamas releases hostages. Like, shooting children is a no-brainer.
What makes you or Netanyahu any better than Hamas?
Literally nothing.
No, I said there was no logic to calling for a ceasefire without addressing hostages.
It makes lots of sense. With a ceasefire Israel will stop shooting and blowing up their own hostages to be rescued.
That is not logical, that is your own fantasy.
Reuter's is my personal fantasy? Wow okay zionist.
At least I knew the word zionist before October 7th and know what it means. It's not really a pejorative.
You act like you were the only one. But then again, that's not the only thing you're wrong about.