rule0x2d@lemmy.ml to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone – 723 points – 7 months ago48Post a CommentPreviewYou are viewing a single commentView all commentsThis will make for interesting primary source material in a 2075 history bookI mean, seems like a textbook example of satire.The original comic was created to illustrated the absurdity of misusing^1^ the word "literally." Then, conservatives captioned it and shared it unironically as an anti-LGBTQ+ meme. Then, a third group understandably found the conservatives' version laughable, and it's been mostly shared ironically ever since. ^1^I don't necessarily agree with the post. It's okay to use "literally" just for emphasis, in my opinion.They should have put the /s
This will make for interesting primary source material in a 2075 history bookI mean, seems like a textbook example of satire.The original comic was created to illustrated the absurdity of misusing^1^ the word "literally." Then, conservatives captioned it and shared it unironically as an anti-LGBTQ+ meme. Then, a third group understandably found the conservatives' version laughable, and it's been mostly shared ironically ever since. ^1^I don't necessarily agree with the post. It's okay to use "literally" just for emphasis, in my opinion.They should have put the /s
I mean, seems like a textbook example of satire.The original comic was created to illustrated the absurdity of misusing^1^ the word "literally." Then, conservatives captioned it and shared it unironically as an anti-LGBTQ+ meme. Then, a third group understandably found the conservatives' version laughable, and it's been mostly shared ironically ever since. ^1^I don't necessarily agree with the post. It's okay to use "literally" just for emphasis, in my opinion.They should have put the /s
The original comic was created to illustrated the absurdity of misusing^1^ the word "literally." Then, conservatives captioned it and shared it unironically as an anti-LGBTQ+ meme. Then, a third group understandably found the conservatives' version laughable, and it's been mostly shared ironically ever since. ^1^I don't necessarily agree with the post. It's okay to use "literally" just for emphasis, in my opinion.
This will make for interesting primary source material in a 2075 history book
I mean, seems like a textbook example of satire.
The original comic was created to illustrated the absurdity of misusing^1^ the word "literally." Then, conservatives captioned it and shared it unironically as an anti-LGBTQ+ meme. Then, a third group understandably found the conservatives' version laughable, and it's been mostly shared ironically ever since.
^1^I don't necessarily agree with the post. It's okay to use "literally" just for emphasis, in my opinion.
They should have put the /s