I genuinely believe he just wants to make cool and fun games.
He's had all the time, money, and resources to do that and hasn't.
I don't think that :/ I think his statements and the games he chooses to back sort of prove that ultimately profit is what he is interested in. I don't blame him for that. But don't make him out to be what he isn't. He is a CEO first, being a fan of games falls lower on the list.
They aren't exclusionary.
No but if you "just want to make cool and fun games" you wouldn't fund Gears 5 or Halo Infinite now would you?
I think Phil like most executives prioritise whatever they think will be best for their career, regardless of what their preference is
![Phil Spencer blames capitalism for games industry woes: 'I don't get [the] luxury of not having to run a profitable growing business'](https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/ad52be4c-4529-48df-ae10-9135c073f0f7.jpeg?format=jpg&thumbnail=256)
I genuinely believe he just wants to make cool and fun games.
He's had all the time, money, and resources to do that and hasn't.
I don't think that :/ I think his statements and the games he chooses to back sort of prove that ultimately profit is what he is interested in. I don't blame him for that. But don't make him out to be what he isn't. He is a CEO first, being a fan of games falls lower on the list.
They aren't exclusionary.
No but if you "just want to make cool and fun games" you wouldn't fund Gears 5 or Halo Infinite now would you?
I think Phil like most executives prioritise whatever they think will be best for their career, regardless of what their preference is