Google mocks Epic’s proposed reforms to end Android app market monopoly

jeffw@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.world – 137 points –
Google mocks Epic’s proposed reforms to end Android app market monopoly
arstechnica.com
33

You are viewing a single comment

They probably mean, for example, not having to prompt the user to allow installs from "unknown sources", allowing alternative app stores to update apps and themselves automatically in the background like Google Play does, allow installations from alternative stores with one tap without extra user interaction, etc.

I must have had an extension at the time, but it sounds like F-Droid does automatic updates for anything Android 12+ now?

https://f-droid.org/de/2024/02/01/twif.html

I guess the nag screen can be scary, though. Good point

The nag screen is important for a bunch of less technically literate people who would otherwise install malware without thinking twice.

Or even once.

I really don’t know how to feel about it

The people it’s intended to protect will just click “yes” to anything in my experience

I don’t have a statistical analysis of results over a normal distribution of the world population, though

I feel like Epic wouldn't be so strident about it without proof that it negatively affecting install rate.

But maybe the perception that it affects the rate is sufficient.

I think it affects install rate by design, which is bad for Epic in this case but good for security in most

I just tested it by updating something and it didn't work, so I would say no, we don't have background updates on F-Droid.