Draw your own conculsionsThe Picard Maneuver@lemmy.worldmod to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world – 493 points – 6 months ago95Post a CommentPreviewYou are viewing a single commentView all commentsShow the parent commentYou could've just said "Correlation does not imply causation" and moved on but man... Correlation does not imply causation what does this have to do with anything in this discussion?The OP is a joke post, you don't have to try so hard to prove your point since the OP is not even trying to be consistent.no but some idiots said I was wrong with saying that the percentage for women is lower and showed some random handpicked studies to "prove" it. so I simply showed them OPs statistic but with the women's data added. they've been weirdly silent ever since
You could've just said "Correlation does not imply causation" and moved on but man... Correlation does not imply causation what does this have to do with anything in this discussion?The OP is a joke post, you don't have to try so hard to prove your point since the OP is not even trying to be consistent.no but some idiots said I was wrong with saying that the percentage for women is lower and showed some random handpicked studies to "prove" it. so I simply showed them OPs statistic but with the women's data added. they've been weirdly silent ever since
Correlation does not imply causation what does this have to do with anything in this discussion?The OP is a joke post, you don't have to try so hard to prove your point since the OP is not even trying to be consistent.no but some idiots said I was wrong with saying that the percentage for women is lower and showed some random handpicked studies to "prove" it. so I simply showed them OPs statistic but with the women's data added. they've been weirdly silent ever since
The OP is a joke post, you don't have to try so hard to prove your point since the OP is not even trying to be consistent.no but some idiots said I was wrong with saying that the percentage for women is lower and showed some random handpicked studies to "prove" it. so I simply showed them OPs statistic but with the women's data added. they've been weirdly silent ever since
no but some idiots said I was wrong with saying that the percentage for women is lower and showed some random handpicked studies to "prove" it. so I simply showed them OPs statistic but with the women's data added. they've been weirdly silent ever since
You could've just said "Correlation does not imply causation" and moved on but man...
what does this have to do with anything in this discussion?
The OP is a joke post, you don't have to try so hard to prove your point since the OP is not even trying to be consistent.
no but some idiots said I was wrong with saying that the percentage for women is lower and showed some random handpicked studies to "prove" it.
so I simply showed them OPs statistic but with the women's data added. they've been weirdly silent ever since