Establishing a new Fediquette

Zozano@lemmy.world to Fediverse@lemmy.ml – 122 points –

Old habits die hard, but there's Reddiquette which needs to be revived, and some which needs to die.

Many "golden-age" redditors remember a time when downvoting was reserved for hostility, not a different opinion. For the sake of our growing community I would like to implore everyone to be awesome to each other.

However, this place is not Reddit.

  • We don't measure in bananas here.
  • We don't need to append "edit: typo" to edited posts and comments.
  • if you see something which is worthy of a downvote: down vote and move on! Don't engage with it and feed the algorithm/engament machine so other people are exposed to it when sorting by active.
128

You are viewing a single comment

We don’t need to append “edit: typo” to edited posts and comments.

I didn't do that because it was reddit etiquette. I did it because people can see I edited my post, and I would like them to be able to see why

Why tell them you fixed typos? What's the point?

I've edited my comments for years to fix typos and clarify statments, and I never once had anyone accuse me of being disingenuous.

And even if they did, that's their, and their conspiratorial mind's problem.

Because otherwise people don't know why I edited the post. Did I change my opinion? Did I add some context or detail I missed the first time around? Or did I just fix a typo? A reason just makes it easy for people to have more context

That's the thing though, it's a paradox.

Anyone who is considerable enough to use "edit:" for legitimate reasons would not be the people who would be deceptive and change their posts to reflect a new opinion.

"edit: typo" is essentially just a defense against an imaginary accusation that you were being malicious.

By all means, edit posts to include extra information as an appendage, but closing with "edit: added info" is not very helpful.

You misunderstand. I'm not doing it so that people know that I made a legit edit, I'm doing it so people know what the legit edit I made is.

but closing with “edit: added info” is not very helpful.

Who is doing that or arguing for that? Vague edit descriptions aren't terribly useful, and I'm not claiming otherwise...

Okay I get you. I thought you were literally typing "edit: typo", as opposed to something like "edit: she was my sisters friend"

I guess we both misunderstood each other lol. I wasn't implying that was your argument, it's just something I find annoying.

I mean, it depends on the context.

Did I make a post, have a lot of people get upset because I worded my post poorly? In which case, a I might make a clarifying edit like "edit: she was my sisters friend" so that future people that see my post don't get confused.

Did I accidentally type "there's" instead of "theirs"? I'd probably just edit it with "edit: typo". Not because people care if I made a typo, but because I want people to know that it wasn't the first type of edit

I agree the context is important, and the examples of rewriting large paragraphs justify clarification, both for new people and returning.

But the original point I made was that you don't need to post "edit: typo" here on Lemmy. We don't have edited post/comment tags, so nobody would know if it's just typos

It's really not that big of a deal anyway, I was just thinking of redundant examples of Rediquete to drum up the conversation.

Posts show as edited in many 3rd party apps and on other platforms

Edit - And in Lemmy too!

/c/TIL

FYI, I can also see an edit to your previous post too, directly in Lemmy!

Oh shit.

PLEASE DON'T TELL ANYONE WHAT I CHANGED.

It was a really embarrassing mistake and I'm sorry I ever said it.

PLEASE DON’T TELL ANYONE WHAT I CHANGED.

That part I can't see. Only that you edited it :)