Manifest v3 update: Vivaldi is future-proofed with its built-in functionalitydvdnet62@feddit.nl to Technology@lemmy.ml – 30 points – 2 weeks agovivaldi.com10Post a CommentPreviewYou are viewing a single commentView all commentsThe article is basically : We have our own inferior adblockers so don't panic when UBO stops working.The classic "we have uBlocker at home" to ad injection pipeline at it again.Still good to have, but too bad they couldn't just piggy back off of Brave's soft fork or something and keep the functionality.For them to peggy back of a competitor work would be a bold and very risky move.Like everyone using an advertisement company's browser engine?Too bad that Mozilla now also owns an Ad network.You're right, Firefox deserves a little blame for that. :-P
The article is basically : We have our own inferior adblockers so don't panic when UBO stops working.The classic "we have uBlocker at home" to ad injection pipeline at it again.Still good to have, but too bad they couldn't just piggy back off of Brave's soft fork or something and keep the functionality.For them to peggy back of a competitor work would be a bold and very risky move.Like everyone using an advertisement company's browser engine?Too bad that Mozilla now also owns an Ad network.You're right, Firefox deserves a little blame for that. :-P
Still good to have, but too bad they couldn't just piggy back off of Brave's soft fork or something and keep the functionality.For them to peggy back of a competitor work would be a bold and very risky move.Like everyone using an advertisement company's browser engine?Too bad that Mozilla now also owns an Ad network.You're right, Firefox deserves a little blame for that. :-P
For them to peggy back of a competitor work would be a bold and very risky move.Like everyone using an advertisement company's browser engine?Too bad that Mozilla now also owns an Ad network.You're right, Firefox deserves a little blame for that. :-P
Like everyone using an advertisement company's browser engine?Too bad that Mozilla now also owns an Ad network.You're right, Firefox deserves a little blame for that. :-P
The article is basically : We have our own inferior adblockers so don't panic when UBO stops working.
The classic "we have uBlocker at home" to ad injection pipeline at it again.
Still good to have, but too bad they couldn't just piggy back off of Brave's soft fork or something and keep the functionality.
For them to peggy back of a competitor work would be a bold and very risky move.
Like everyone using an advertisement company's browser engine?
Too bad that Mozilla now also owns an Ad network.
You're right, Firefox deserves a little blame for that. :-P