Yeah they do. The fact that the company structure is deliberately set up to hide who owns what is one of the main impediments to carrying out the sentence.
They can't take something that belongs to a shell corp that he's not listed as the sole owner of until they prove that he de facto is, and a lot of it is registered in his parents' name for that exact fraudulent purpose.
The shell corps don’t protect in this case
Yeah they do. The fact that the company structure is deliberately set up to hide who owns what is one of the main impediments to carrying out the sentence.
They can't take something that belongs to a shell corp that he's not listed as the sole owner of until they prove that he de facto is, and a lot of it is registered in his parents' name for that exact fraudulent purpose.
I'm saying for his next disinformation show