People who judge based on a single comment (and are radically wrong AF) aren't helpful to anyone who cares an ounce
Sorry. I shouldn't have judged you based on a single comment.
(We both know I wasn't, and was instead judging you based on your long history of vicious hostility towards anyone who wasn't 100% on board with Biden's genocide support, but sure. I'll entertain your bad faith bullshit yet again. Let's pretend I was judging you based on a single comment).
I should have asked instead of assuming. How happy are you that the octogenarian genocide supporter dropped out of the race in favor of a candidate who can actually win?
anyone who wasn't 100% on board with Biden's genocide support
Ah yes, a completely reasonable and good-faith attempt at discourse and in no way a bullshit attempt at smearing anyone who doesn't use the exact same rhetoric as yourself
It's not a smear. I'm accurately describing your attitude to people who oppose genocide.
Harris picked up a voter, so you're mad.
Wtf are you even talking about exactly? I'm glad she is the nominee, it improves our chances, and never once said anything slightly against Harris. The people with the most severe confirmation bias also tend to be extremists who label anyone not with their identical same opinion as a sociopath
I’m glad she is the nominee, it improves our chances, and never once said anything slightly against Harris.
So why are you so mad at someone who said they were going to vote for her?
I criticized the prick for being a prick and that was very obvious. Both that their intention was that and that I wished to point it out. Now tell me again about my love for genocide. Would you rate it as an eleven on a scale of one to ten, or a twelve?
Now tell me again about my love for genocide. Would you rate it as an eleven on a scale of one to ten, or a twelve?
So much that you were willing to support it even if it meant losing to Trump.
God DAMN, just look the fuck around you. Biden is out. Harris is surging in the polls. Democrats are excited to vote instead of resentful and apathetic. And you're calling them pricks because they like Harris more than Bidenyahu.
Wow so shocking you would misrepresent my views in such an absurd manner that no one would take you seriously
Nothing I said was inaccurate in the slightest.
Well let's see.
I'm a human, so there's a 99.999999% chance that genocide is something I find appalling, and as that's such a ridiculous accusation, my repeated sarcasm about it confirms that I'm not in that tiny tiny weird minority of sociopaths.
I have been repeatedly on Lemmy (and ITT) expressing that I think that replacing Biden with Harris was a good move.
Given that I've never expressed an iota of support for Netanyahu/Israel and I deny it when weirdo cavassers lie about it, there would be no valid basis for saying that repeatedly.
Anything else you want to intentionally lieaccidentally get wrong about me? What accurate thing did you say again?
I've never supported Trump. You have repeatedly accused me of such for saying that the US should not be selling weapons for genocide. You've always been angrier at opposition to genocide than you have been toward those committing and supporting it.
Democrats should not be supporting genocide. This simple sentence still gets you calling people trumpers. Even though it's true. Democrats have no business even entertaining support for genocide. Everyone should be ashamed of the actions of those who enable the continued genocide in Gaza.
You're not.
Somehow found slightly new lies to tell. It's fair that maybe I shouldn't accuse people of supporting trump as quickly as I have sometimes. But to be fair you have never once responded when I ask you to explain why you're obsessed with the genocide support accusations. It's just simply a stupid nonstarter. No one loves genocide, we both know that, but you can't help yourself. I ask once again why is that? Why do you feel the need to lie about it every day of your life?
Saying "Democrats support genocide" is another milder nonstarter but still a nonstarter. Who do you mean? It's a stretch to say that anyone but a handful of politicians actually "support" it. But you cannot fucking wait to say it. Cannot not say it. And you word it such that it's vague AF who you're even talking about so you "can't be wrong" but also make millions of people sound bad who in no way align with your accusation. Hmm, interesting.
And finally the claim that I don't care about Gaza..
is pretty fucking flawed. Out of all the thousands of things I care about, you know about like 3. So it's a flat out braindead logic pattern to even claim you begin to know shit about what I care about. The obsession with telling me I love genocide guarantees I'll never talk to you about what I do love though.
And I think you know all of this. Most canvassers know what they are doing.
People who judge based on a single comment (and are radically wrong AF) aren't helpful to anyone who cares an ounce
Sorry. I shouldn't have judged you based on a single comment.
(We both know I wasn't, and was instead judging you based on your long history of vicious hostility towards anyone who wasn't 100% on board with Biden's genocide support, but sure. I'll entertain your bad faith bullshit yet again. Let's pretend I was judging you based on a single comment).
I should have asked instead of assuming. How happy are you that the octogenarian genocide supporter dropped out of the race in favor of a candidate who can actually win?
Ah yes, a completely reasonable and good-faith attempt at discourse and in no way a bullshit attempt at smearing anyone who doesn't use the exact same rhetoric as yourself
It's not a smear. I'm accurately describing your attitude to people who oppose genocide.
Harris picked up a voter, so you're mad.
Wtf are you even talking about exactly? I'm glad she is the nominee, it improves our chances, and never once said anything slightly against Harris. The people with the most severe confirmation bias also tend to be extremists who label anyone not with their identical same opinion as a sociopath
So why are you so mad at someone who said they were going to vote for her?
I criticized the prick for being a prick and that was very obvious. Both that their intention was that and that I wished to point it out. Now tell me again about my love for genocide. Would you rate it as an eleven on a scale of one to ten, or a twelve?
So much that you were willing to support it even if it meant losing to Trump.
God DAMN, just look the fuck around you. Biden is out. Harris is surging in the polls. Democrats are excited to vote instead of resentful and apathetic. And you're calling them pricks because they like Harris more than Bidenyahu.
Wow so shocking you would misrepresent my views in such an absurd manner that no one would take you seriously
Nothing I said was inaccurate in the slightest.
Well let's see.
Anything else you want to
intentionally lieaccidentally get wrong about me? What accurate thing did you say again?I've never supported Trump. You have repeatedly accused me of such for saying that the US should not be selling weapons for genocide. You've always been angrier at opposition to genocide than you have been toward those committing and supporting it.
Democrats should not be supporting genocide. This simple sentence still gets you calling people trumpers. Even though it's true. Democrats have no business even entertaining support for genocide. Everyone should be ashamed of the actions of those who enable the continued genocide in Gaza.
You're not.
Somehow found slightly new lies to tell. It's fair that maybe I shouldn't accuse people of supporting trump as quickly as I have sometimes. But to be fair you have never once responded when I ask you to explain why you're obsessed with the genocide support accusations. It's just simply a stupid nonstarter. No one loves genocide, we both know that, but you can't help yourself. I ask once again why is that? Why do you feel the need to lie about it every day of your life?
Saying "Democrats support genocide" is another milder nonstarter but still a nonstarter. Who do you mean? It's a stretch to say that anyone but a handful of politicians actually "support" it. But you cannot fucking wait to say it. Cannot not say it. And you word it such that it's vague AF who you're even talking about so you "can't be wrong" but also make millions of people sound bad who in no way align with your accusation. Hmm, interesting.
And finally the claim that I don't care about Gaza.. is pretty fucking flawed. Out of all the thousands of things I care about, you know about like 3. So it's a flat out braindead logic pattern to even claim you begin to know shit about what I care about. The obsession with telling me I love genocide guarantees I'll never talk to you about what I do love though.
And I think you know all of this. Most canvassers know what they are doing.