70 House Republicans voted to cut off all US military aid to UkraineNightOwl@lemmy.fmhy.ml to World News@lemmy.ml – 232 points – 1 years agobusinessinsider.nl82Post a CommentPreviewYou are viewing a single commentView all commentsShow the parent commentYou're willfully dancing around the actual point OP is making. You can't be a grown adult and think this concretely without doing so in bad faith. The point is that opposing this is directly showing support for Russia... The point is that opposing this is directly showing support for Russia… Which guess what: isn't high treason. If you'll notice, I havent offered my opinion here or participated elsewhere in the thread. I was simply pointing out that using the term "high treason" here is rather silly and nonfactual.Does taking foreign money for your vote constitute high treason in your definition? Because in the US constitution it does.So you aren't making any argument at all, and are just saying "everyone look at my bold linguistic castle. It is very cromulent."
You're willfully dancing around the actual point OP is making. You can't be a grown adult and think this concretely without doing so in bad faith. The point is that opposing this is directly showing support for Russia... The point is that opposing this is directly showing support for Russia… Which guess what: isn't high treason. If you'll notice, I havent offered my opinion here or participated elsewhere in the thread. I was simply pointing out that using the term "high treason" here is rather silly and nonfactual.Does taking foreign money for your vote constitute high treason in your definition? Because in the US constitution it does.So you aren't making any argument at all, and are just saying "everyone look at my bold linguistic castle. It is very cromulent."
The point is that opposing this is directly showing support for Russia… Which guess what: isn't high treason. If you'll notice, I havent offered my opinion here or participated elsewhere in the thread. I was simply pointing out that using the term "high treason" here is rather silly and nonfactual.Does taking foreign money for your vote constitute high treason in your definition? Because in the US constitution it does.So you aren't making any argument at all, and are just saying "everyone look at my bold linguistic castle. It is very cromulent."
Does taking foreign money for your vote constitute high treason in your definition? Because in the US constitution it does.
So you aren't making any argument at all, and are just saying "everyone look at my bold linguistic castle. It is very cromulent."
You're willfully dancing around the actual point OP is making. You can't be a grown adult and think this concretely without doing so in bad faith.
The point is that opposing this is directly showing support for Russia...
Which guess what: isn't high treason. If you'll notice, I havent offered my opinion here or participated elsewhere in the thread.
I was simply pointing out that using the term "high treason" here is rather silly and nonfactual.
Does taking foreign money for your vote constitute high treason in your definition? Because in the US constitution it does.
So you aren't making any argument at all, and are just saying "everyone look at my bold linguistic castle. It is very cromulent."