The big question touching a nerve this election: "Can my husband find out who I am voting for?"
Can my husband find out who I am voting for in the Presidential Election?"
Olivia Dreizen Howell, the founder of a website to help women get back on their feet after a breakup or divorce, tweeted last week, "We've been getting this question a lot," so she followed up with some facts. As the Washington Post confirmed with experts, the answer is simple: "No; it will be public record that you voted, but not how you filled out your ballot."
The GOP ticket is led by a sexual predator who a jury found "'raped' [journalist E. Jean Carroll] as many people commonly understand the word 'rape,'" the judge in the case wrote. His running mate, Sen. JD Vance of Ohio, has called for a national abortion ban, wrote the forward to a book that denounced contraception for making pregnancy "seem like an optional and not natural result of having sex," and repeatedly called women who haven't given birth "sociopathic" and "childless cat ladies."
Meanwhile, the Democratic ticket is led by a woman who chose "Freedom" by Beyoncé as her campaign song, and has dispensed with the mealy-mouthed language about abortion rights to declare she stands for "the freedom of a woman to make decisions about her own body." Her running mate, Gov. Tim Walz of Minnesota, her running mate, has decried "weird" MAGA Republicans of the "he-man woman haters’ club."
a) some states are pure vote by mail. b) if you have the option of voting at home, that exact same abuser can make you exercise it.
I used to oppose VBM because of this. Now I see it as a trade off since there are also benefits that can outweigh the problems. But a person with their eyes open should not pretend that the problems don't exist.
Which states? I am not aware of any that are solely vote by mail.
If you wanted to, it would be easy to screw up your ballot request. Throw it out when you get it, mess up the form, forget to sign, offer to take it to the post office and never mail it... Then it's "oh no it never came, let's just go vote in person".
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postal_voting_in_the_United_States#All_vote-by-mail
And, the existence of methods to escape abusers prevents some instances of abuse, but doesn't eliminate the problem.
From the article you linked
Yes, that is California. In the exact same paragraph, other states are listed which don't offer the option. Oregon was the one that came to my mind immediately.
The issue is, having an option to do something the right way is not all that helpful. If there is an option to do it the wrong way, attackers (using "attacker" in the sense of computer security) will do what they can to make you use that option, so they can exploit it. Therefore, security systems should make doing the wrong thing impossible, rather than merely making the right thing possible.
You're correct, I should have been more thorough.
Here's one of the sources cited by that Wikipedia article:
According to this, "All mail elections" are not different from "mostly mail" elections, and doesn't preclude the use of in person voting.
Also
Please no, imo that's an incredibly fucked line of reasoning
You can't vote in person in Oregon. There are no voting booths in the state. It is ALL done by mail, the way I heard it.
"Casting a ballot at a polling place" is not "voting in person". I sometimes cast my own ballots (California) at polling places. That is, fill in the ballot at home, and drop it off at the polling station instead of mailing it. Voting in person means there is a physical voting booth that you enter, close the curtain, and THEN make your voting choices, in an environment where no one else can see them. Poll workers are supposed to make sure that nobody goes into the booth with you, with some exceptions for disabled people (there are similar exceptions for absentee voting in non-VBM states). It's against the law to photograph your filled-in ballot inside the booth, though in the phone camera era that has become near impossible to enforce.
It is what you have to do in a secure system. Voting (like retail loss prevention) is of course a security vs convenience trade-off, so you might choose to allow the insecure approach at least some of the time. Again, a person with their eyes open has to be aware of all the issues and reach an informed conclusion. See:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Downgrade_attack
Yeah, ok, that sucks. Oregon should still try to make actual polling locations available for people who need (or want) it.
I still don't think that that's a reason to abandon vote by mail altogether. The accessibility of it reduces the impact of other voting problems we have in the us overall.
I'm still going to push back hard on the idea that the system has to be 100% perfect. So long as humans are involved, that simply isn't possible.
There are always going to be tradeoffs.
I'm not currently proposing abandoning VBM, I'm just saying people shouldn't ignore the issue. A secret ballot is supposed to be one of the foundations of democracy and VBM doesn't provide it the way a voting booth does. These days though, I would be scared of voting booths (at least where there are long lines) because of COVID. COVID is what kicked California over to near-universal VBM in 2019, after all.
People have studied and analyzed this stuff for centuries and it's very easy to overlook things or make false assumptions if you just examine the immediate situation, without awareness of its long history. I'm not any kind of expert, but as a security nerd, I've seen the topic come up in that context.