I realize I may get some divisive answers, but if NATO Countries all agreed, mobilized, and went into Russia full force with no warning, what are the likely outcomes?

DominusOfMegadeus@sh.itjust.works to Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world – 113 points –

EDIT: For clarification, I feel that the current situation on the ground in the war (vs. say a year ago) might indicate that an attack on Russia might not result in instant nuclear war, which is what prompted my question. I am well aware of the “instant nuclear Armageddon” opinion.

Serious question. I don’t need to be called stupid. I realize nuclear war is bad. Thanks!

132

You are viewing a single comment

In a conventional war they would crush Russia. Remember when the United States captured Baghdad in a week? It would be like that. But the chances are high that Putin would start launching nukes, and then everyone loses.

I'm not willing to gamble but I don't think they'd go nuclear. The trick is to offer amnesty and support to everyone but Putin so they have a better option than death for themselves and their families. Loyalty to dictators is always about self preservation.

They would drop tactical nukes on NATO forces.

It's never going to happen anyways.

They would drop tactical nukes on NATO forces.

Yeah maybe. I was operating under the prevailing idea in this thread that NATO would steamroll through Russia. It's not something I necessarily agree with.

It's never going to happen anyways.

Well, quite. This is all just a thought experiment, no one thinks it could happen. NATO is a purely defensive alliance.