When u don't care how much people cry about what you post.
You'd stop posting the minute everyone ignored you. Since you know the stakes of this election though, you know that won't happen.
When you post articles that use data that is damn near a month out of date. Polls from August 25th? Or is it August 27th? Wasn't that prior to the debate pounding that Harris gave Trump? On top of that where is this data from? What CAIR has posted at first glance does not include geographic breakdowns, so where did that data actually come from?
I didn't write the Rueters news article. The date of the article shows "September 19, 20243:21 PM MDT."
If you believe any part of the article is inaccurate, I encourage you to reach out to the news organization that published it.
The date of the article is irrelevant, the article clearly shows the poll was made August 25 to August 27th.
And I'm not going to bitch to Reuters about the audacity you had to post such nonsense data to a politics community.
If you believe any part of the article is inaccurate, I encourage you to reach out to the news organization that published it.
And I just told you that I don't have a problem with Reuters. I totally get that it is not high priority news and it took them a while to put out a report about it.
I just told you that it's you I have a problem with.
I don't have to explain anything to you. I posted an article.
I didn't have a problem with it. You did. That's ok.
When u know who posted before clicking.
When u don't care how much people cry about what you post.
You'd stop posting the minute everyone ignored you. Since you know the stakes of this election though, you know that won't happen.
When you post articles that use data that is damn near a month out of date. Polls from August 25th? Or is it August 27th? Wasn't that prior to the debate pounding that Harris gave Trump? On top of that where is this data from? What CAIR has posted at first glance does not include geographic breakdowns, so where did that data actually come from?
I didn't write the Rueters news article. The date of the article shows "September 19, 20243:21 PM MDT."
If you believe any part of the article is inaccurate, I encourage you to reach out to the news organization that published it.
The date of the article is irrelevant, the article clearly shows the poll was made August 25 to August 27th.
And I'm not going to bitch to Reuters about the audacity you had to post such nonsense data to a politics community.
If you believe any part of the article is inaccurate, I encourage you to reach out to the news organization that published it.
And I just told you that I don't have a problem with Reuters. I totally get that it is not high priority news and it took them a while to put out a report about it.
I just told you that it's you I have a problem with.
I don't have to explain anything to you. I posted an article.
I didn't have a problem with it. You did. That's ok.