People sticking with audio jack phones, why is USB-C earphones not a solution?

zephyr@lemmy.world to Android@lemdro.id – 130 points –

Don't get me wrong. Apple removing audio jack was the biggest facepalm in smartphone history. And you can thank it for not being able to make an upgrade without sacrificing audio jack (and SD card too :/). But USB-C is getting standardized everywhere now (laptops, smartphones, etc.). What makes USB-C earphones not worth the switch?

237

You are viewing a single comment
View all commentsShow the parent comment

I was looking for someone to mention the connection itself. To add to that the connector is a lot more delicate since it's some 4024 pins vs 3 or 4.

AND if my one USB-C port wears out from use, now I need a whole ass new phone now as opposed to "oh damn, well the phone still works without headphones, I'll suffer for a bit until I can comfortably replace it."

This is actually something I had once considered too. It's not that they want to downgrade the port itself, it's also that they want to downgrade the AMOUNT of it. I went looking for phones with two ports (I was also curious about using a phone as a data bus) and I could literally find none.

This is why when it comes time to decide on a compromise, Bluetooth (and its audio issues) wins out versus anything with ports. Because it's a solution that doesn't throw away options with it.