The new Sony Walkman costs more than you think, here's why

muaveri@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.world – 102 points –
The New Sony Walkman Costs More Than You Think - Here's Why
slashgear.com
107

You are viewing a single comment

Well… it won't matter once you listen to music on them with your shitty 20 USD headphones.

No no, I use the beats fit pro that are recommended in the article underneath. They actually suck hard, but the review seems to think they’re the second coming. So take all this with a grain of salt.

1 more...

Yea, I have found by far the biggest effect for me (and I have to imagine most people) is the speakers / headphones, not the digital processing or even the audio converters.

headphones or speakers can't add the detail that mp3 (or streaming in whatever format) eliminates. Compare a CD and mp3 of the same track with a decent headphone (or a speaker) and you will hear that compression changes sounds.

but it all depends on what kind of music you listen to. For some of today's music even laptop speakers are enough 🤷

Nah come on, bro. You and I both know laptop speakers are trash. Good headphones are a must. I've heard so many sounds I've never noticed before with good headphones.

yes 😁 yes, but this new vocoder popshit i've been hearing from bluetooth boxes in backpacks is good enough for laptop speakers

My point is just that most headphones that are cheap can't reproduce MP3 quality, so until you get good enough headphones to hear the difference, getting a FLAC of the same song isn't going to really be noticable.

It also won't matter once you take a step outside; slightest ambient noise is enough to kill most of the advantages a high-end source provides.

That depends: proper Shure IEMs usually do a good job covering ambient noise. Somewhere north of 200 USD you usually get proper in ear monitors… but only if it's from one of the regular professional equipment brands, otherwise you'll probably pay for design or the name and little else.

1 more...