If one innocent person is tortured so that everyone else can live and the world doesn't end, is that simultaneously unfair but also morally preferable over complete destruction of everything?

SeahorseTreble@lemmy.world to Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world – 89 points –
96

You are viewing a single comment

Not really. It's more like:

Everyone ending

One innocent ending to keep everyone else alive

That's more challenging.

More challenging is to remove the benefit of answering as a bystander and hand over an active role, so now the question is would you torture an innocent to keep the world alive. Then question progresses to what if that innocent is someone you care most about to see the extent of their resolve

5 more...