As far as I know it essentially boils down to systemd doing too many things.
Critics argue that systemd is too complex and monolithic, making it harder to troubleshoot. They worry about a single point of failure, as all services are managed by one daemon, and voice concerns about tight integration with the Linux kernel, which could limit portability to other systems.
At least it's actually documented.
I appreciate your explanation. I had no idea.
this makes sense. thank you
I don't feel like anything is wrong with systemd, but options are apart of what makes Linux so awesome.
I'm pretty sure that you mean "a part of" rather than "apart of". Otherwise it sounds like you are saying options and Linux are two different things.
whats wrong with systemd?
https://itsfoss.com/systemd-init/
As far as I know it essentially boils down to systemd doing too many things.
At least it's actually documented.
I appreciate your explanation. I had no idea.
this makes sense. thank you
I don't feel like anything is wrong with systemd, but options are apart of what makes Linux so awesome.
I'm pretty sure that you mean "a part of" rather than "apart of". Otherwise it sounds like you are saying options and Linux are two different things.
Oh boy, here we go again...