As far as I know it essentially boils down to systemd doing too many things.
Critics argue that systemd is too complex and monolithic, making it harder to troubleshoot. They worry about a single point of failure, as all services are managed by one daemon, and voice concerns about tight integration with the Linux kernel, which could limit portability to other systems.
At least it's actually documented.
I appreciate your explanation. I had no idea.
this makes sense. thank you
Oh boy, here we go again...
I went to DL it and try it out, and… dude, I hate Sourceforge. I know how privileged this sounds, but I'm not spending a half hour DLing something that I can DL in a minute and a half somewhere else.
Anybody got a line on a torrent?
How does the immutability come into play with Nitrux vs, say NixOS?
whats wrong with systemd?
I don't feel like anything is wrong with systemd, but options are apart of what makes Linux so awesome.
I'm pretty sure that you mean "a part of" rather than "apart of". Otherwise it sounds like you are saying options and Linux are two different things.
https://itsfoss.com/systemd-init/
As far as I know it essentially boils down to systemd doing too many things.
At least it's actually documented.
I appreciate your explanation. I had no idea.
this makes sense. thank you
Oh boy, here we go again...
I went to DL it and try it out, and… dude, I hate Sourceforge. I know how privileged this sounds, but I'm not spending a half hour DLing something that I can DL in a minute and a half somewhere else.
Anybody got a line on a torrent?
How does the immutability come into play with Nitrux vs, say NixOS?