Intel's ditching the 'i' in 'Core i5/i7/i9' and will stop calling out chip generationsDaleGribble88@programming.dev to Gaming@beehaw.org – 96 points – 1 years agopcgamer.com36Post a CommentPreviewYou are viewing a single commentView all commentsShow the parent commentAMD's new naming scheme is also horrific https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2022/09/amd-is-making-laptop-cpu-model-numbers-simultaneously-less-and-more-confusing/The two market leaders woke up and chose violenceIt has all the info about the CPU in the name, that's kinda coolIt's got some fluff, but it's basically the same as any gpu in the last 15 years. First number for generation, second for comparing performance within the generation.Weird scheme but at least high number good.URGH1 more...
AMD's new naming scheme is also horrific https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2022/09/amd-is-making-laptop-cpu-model-numbers-simultaneously-less-and-more-confusing/The two market leaders woke up and chose violenceIt has all the info about the CPU in the name, that's kinda coolIt's got some fluff, but it's basically the same as any gpu in the last 15 years. First number for generation, second for comparing performance within the generation.Weird scheme but at least high number good.URGH1 more...
It's got some fluff, but it's basically the same as any gpu in the last 15 years. First number for generation, second for comparing performance within the generation.
AMD's new naming scheme is also horrific
https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2022/09/amd-is-making-laptop-cpu-model-numbers-simultaneously-less-and-more-confusing/
The two market leaders woke up and chose violence
It has all the info about the CPU in the name, that's kinda cool
It's got some fluff, but it's basically the same as any gpu in the last 15 years. First number for generation, second for comparing performance within the generation.
Weird scheme but at least high number good.
URGH