Apple snubs Nvidia for AI training kit, chooses Google • The RegistersabreW4K3@lazysoci.al to Technology@beehaw.org – 26 points – 2 months agotheregister.com5Post a CommentPreviewHotTopNewOldThe last paragraph is interesting. Sure, generating harmful responses 7.5% of the time is better than 51% of the time. But we're still far from a safe LLM, if that's even possible. I'd rather companies would NOT make LLMs available publicly as a service unless the rate is < 1%. What they're doing now isn't responsible. What they’re doing now isn’t responsible. Would it be responsible if every response would start with "I lie x % of the time but here's my response:"?Would it be responsible to sell canned beef which makes you sick 7.5% of the time? What if there was notice saying "Only 7.5% of our delicious canned beef contain listeria"? This is how to cover your ass. This is not how to be responsible."snubs"? I have no problem idea what that means. Even with the context.In this case it means opts for alternative
The last paragraph is interesting. Sure, generating harmful responses 7.5% of the time is better than 51% of the time. But we're still far from a safe LLM, if that's even possible. I'd rather companies would NOT make LLMs available publicly as a service unless the rate is < 1%. What they're doing now isn't responsible. What they’re doing now isn’t responsible. Would it be responsible if every response would start with "I lie x % of the time but here's my response:"?Would it be responsible to sell canned beef which makes you sick 7.5% of the time? What if there was notice saying "Only 7.5% of our delicious canned beef contain listeria"? This is how to cover your ass. This is not how to be responsible.
What they’re doing now isn’t responsible. Would it be responsible if every response would start with "I lie x % of the time but here's my response:"?Would it be responsible to sell canned beef which makes you sick 7.5% of the time? What if there was notice saying "Only 7.5% of our delicious canned beef contain listeria"? This is how to cover your ass. This is not how to be responsible.
Would it be responsible to sell canned beef which makes you sick 7.5% of the time? What if there was notice saying "Only 7.5% of our delicious canned beef contain listeria"? This is how to cover your ass. This is not how to be responsible.
"snubs"? I have no problem idea what that means. Even with the context.In this case it means opts for alternative
The last paragraph is interesting.
Sure, generating harmful responses 7.5% of the time is better than 51% of the time. But we're still far from a safe LLM, if that's even possible.
I'd rather companies would NOT make LLMs available publicly as a service unless the rate is < 1%. What they're doing now isn't responsible.
Would it be responsible if every response would start with "I lie x % of the time but here's my response:"?
Would it be responsible to sell canned beef which makes you sick 7.5% of the time?
What if there was notice saying "Only 7.5% of our delicious canned beef contain listeria"?
This is how to cover your ass. This is not how to be responsible.
"snubs"?
I have no problem idea what that means. Even with the context.
In this case it means opts for alternative