Says 1-bit then goes on to describe inputs as -1, 0, or 1. That's 2-bit. Am I missing something here?
It’s actually 1.58bits weirdly. The addition of 0 here was the significant change/improvement in this experiment. The paper isn’t too dense and has some decent tables that explain things fairly accessibly.
Why use lot bit when one bit do trick?
Bits together weak
Says 1-bit then goes on to describe inputs as -1, 0, or 1. That's 2-bit. Am I missing something here?
It’s actually 1.58bits weirdly. The addition of 0 here was the significant change/improvement in this experiment. The paper isn’t too dense and has some decent tables that explain things fairly accessibly.