[The Linux Experiment] Linux distros need to evolve (away from traditional package management)
![](https://beehaw.org/pictrs/image/ac6134e7-969c-49f6-baf4-72ec3b4e6a11.jpeg)
![](https://beehaw.org/pictrs/image/1be75b15-2f18-429d-acf7-dcea8e512a4b.png)
![The LINUX DISTRO model is BROKEN](https://forkk.me/pictrs/image/2ce63aee-8937-494e-a2d5-1bcc4b4c1581.jpeg?format=jpg&thumbnail=256)
tilvids.com
As a basis for the post title, I used the thumbnail "title" instead of the somewhat clickbaity title Nick used for the video.
For those who rather watch on Youtube for whatever reason: https://youtu.be/8yAo9Bc6iOI
Maybe if Snap or Flatpak had a solution for downloading the same libraries for every package.
It also brings up security issues. Instead of relying on 1 vulnerable package to be updated, I now have to make sure every single snap or Flatpak that uses that library is updated.
This typically takes MUCH longer than waiting for the distro maintainers to patch a library. (Your milage may vary depending on the distro of course)
You can pry apt from my cold, dead hands.
Thanks for posting a better, more descriptive title than the original! And for including the YT link. TILVids doesn't seem as accessible (lack of captions/subtitle) so having the option, although not idea, is better.
I wish I could be all aboard with Flatpak, but I found out that there's probably very few apps on there that actually works on a 32-bit OS (I'm trying to revive an old netbook). Probably part of that niche use case where Flatpak...falls flat[^1]. So that netbook is stuck with the distro's package maintainers.
I do agree that there is a time and place for both the distro package managers and Flatpak/Snap and I wouldn't want to see the former disappear completely. Even when Flatpak/Snap improves and have better coverage.
[^1]: I'll see myself out 😶