You accept, must the frog
You accept, must the frog
Froot*
The headline doesn't say that
I know this is what-about-ism but I really wish we cared half as much about Meta having already destabilized the last two presidential elections.
Please, be reasonable:
return post.Contains("Twitter") || post.Contains("elon") ? "loser" : "cool";
Mine is just running stock, but depending on what you're trying to do with it I could imagine that a few things might not be palatable to some.
Well he is on the left banister. But it's the banister in his right? Is this an allegory?
What if you don't intend to see someone before New Year's and want to wish them a happy New Year as well, while being lazy?
I really don't get this hatred for "Happy Holidays", because even if you want to discredit the non Christian holidays in December/January, there are still two...
It's also the thoughts and words of the women who hear it. But maybe they aren't normal people in your opinion.
I don't think I've hated reading something I so emphatically agreed with before
That's a cool narrative you made up. You actually aren't required to have your birth year in your username on most sites.
Good luck with that, granddragon88
As someone who shares your birth year, I think you gotta accept that the HH meaning is enough of a stain to avoid putting it in your usernames
Look, you just had your world view challenged. You have been informed that you may be doing something that contributes to misogyny.
The non-sexist thing to do is to listen. Educate yourself on the subject. Learn how you can be a better person.
The sexist thing to do is to double down. Talk over every other voice. Lash out at the world and claim you are the only person who talks to women.
So, those are all instances of "Male" as an adjective, and most of them are still pretty clinical or professional in nature. The problem stated was using Female as a noun in non-clinical situations. Like staring at a strangers ass, in the screenshot. Is there an example where you would call a man "a male", like the original post?
To use your example, it would be saying something like: "It's just a male bonding night with the males"
This has not been picked up by any reputable sources. Mostly because I don't believe it just happened. According to Code Pink, who organized the protest being filmed, this event happened in October, and the protester who the comment was directed to is on Day 8 of a fast, which probably means this event did not happen yesterday. Though this is also very heavily biased reporting.
The daily wire is reposting it as news to drum up ire and views. It should still be a red flag when only one source is posting something, and it should prompt you to dig a little deeper.
That said, it seems pretty likely that this is something she really said a few months ago, and that mixed with her recent interviews where she blames Russia... It's not great.
But it would make the rich richer, which makes it a good bet. I think the only thing that would stop private companies being allowed to develop beachfront property in the strip is if it were to turn out to be less profitable.
But that's true of all governments that aren't really looking out for their people.
But really, I've been going through your comment history. You attack everyone over everything. Are you okay?
Yup. You got me. I can't read the comment you deleted.
But, are you okay? This thread was filled with you attacking people trying to talk about cats. Do you need to talk something out?
You just say this every time anyone asks you for evidence, don't you? Well, I'm glad you found more people to scream at.
Is that not a cold, detached way to describe a man? Used by police trying to do their job? Can you think of a usage for male that's more informal?
I know you'll respond with some ad hominem attack that doesn't reference this message at all, but a few questions.
How is asking if you're okay a show of belligerence? How are any of your actions a show of decorum? You started by calling me illiterate, and just now called me a fuckwit. How does that fall into any definition of good faith communication? I stopped being angry at you. I'm not trying to insult you. But everything you say is so sad and pathetic. I legitimately haven't been able to get you out of my head because I can't stop thinking about your complete lack of self reflection.
For what it's worth, at no point was I trying to misinterpret what you're saying. I actually, really, appreciate your thoughts on this. I don't entirely agree with your tactic, but I get it.
Mostly, I think you friendly fire regularly. Sometimes, I really think people don't get what you mean, because there was ambiguity. Sometimes you attack someone before they've made a point to disagree with. In this particular thread, the whole thing started with:
Care to share any evidence towards the kicks being triggered by olfactory overload?
Maybe I'm assuming good intent, but I don't see a reason to assume that's someone doubting you, over someone looking for some reading on cats. I made fun of you for you calling him ignorant with a copy and paste of a message you used on me, and I definitely didn't have a point in the argument, and I definitely don't see how any amount of reading comprehension of your earlier messages would have gotten me to a place of understanding that you were trying to out belligerent me.
I would argue that asking for clarification or examples is not inherently disingenuous. It can be, but it's also a requirement for healthy discussion. You are equally punishing well-intentioned curiosity. I suspect you maybe enjoy being abrasive more than your explanation accounts for... but I get that it's sort of a bit, and you're doing okay.
I'm slightly concerned that you'll push people away from the platform. The kind of trolling you're doing is really hard to distinguish from the kind of trolling that makes Internet forums only really accessible to able bodied cis white males
Your go-to seems to be some real ableist bullshit. This thread was about cats, and I'm not exactly sure we need to gatekeep it to people who hold up to your expectations for debating acumen.
I didn't say I didn't understand anything. I'm not confused. I asked if you're okay. Sympathy is not confusion.
A good half of your comments are insulting people for asking you questions, or responding to you at all. Your response to being acknowledged is anger. You push away everyone. You must be so alone. That warrants sympathy.
There is, though, if you define "toxicity" in a totally weird and nonsensical way.
What makes this a weird or nonsensical thing to call toxic, though? A large number of women, and all the women in my life, take issue with being called females. Am I, a man, or you, who I'm assuming is also a man, in a position to call those women, who I respect as my partner, boss, coworkers, and friends, nonsensical?
It should be a red flag that only one news source is reporting it.
Oh, look, an antisemitic dog whistle and a complaint about people pushing an ideology. In one sentence? That's fun.