S.F. bakery won't serve cops, police union claims. Store says it's about the guns, not the cops
latimes.com
San Francisco’s police union says a city bakery chain has a “bigoted” policy of not serving uniformed cops.
The San Francisco Police Officers Assn. wrote in a social media post last week that Reem’s California “will not serve anyone armed and in uniform” and that includes “members of the U.S. Military.” The union is demanding that the chain “own” its policy.
Reem’s says, however, its policy isn’t against serving armed police officers. It’s against allowing guns inside its businesses.
You are viewing a single comment
Should this be an "or" statement? Showing up naked with a gun would pass this logic.
In SF, open carrying by non-law-enforcement is illegal anyway.
CCW is legal with a license.
You can conceal carry while naked; it's just unwise and uncomfortable.
Nature's holster.
while getting a license in the city is theoretically possible, it is basically impossible
Friends of cops can get CCW licenses tho.
That I did not know
[Weird, sarcastic joke] Uniform? But what about the fire department?! Oh wait, they don't carry guns for some reason. Woah, does that mean they don't just show up and gun people down? That's a neat idea, I like that. Maybe more uniformed services should be like that.
[Song reference] But still, fuck the fire department. Dropping by unannounced just to fry your apartment...
That's preferred, actually, gives them a nice peg to hang the donuts on.
They're cops, you'll be lucky to fit a single doughnut.
What exactly do you think they're going to a bakery for? Birthday cakes?
Are you suggesting the doughnuts will make their penises larger? Because you might be technically right, but I still don't think you'll gain enough to fit a second doughnut.
I think they intended to include people in uniform but unarmed