Peter Navarro convicted of contempt of Congress for defying Jan. 6 committee subpoenaFlying Squid@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world – 478 points – 1 years agocbsnews.com28Post a CommentPreviewYou are viewing a single commentView all commentsShow the parent commentIt needs to be prison time, otherwise it's just the cost of doing business.If the punishment is a fine, it's only illegal for poor people.Hence why all sentences are and/or. Fine of $100,000 and/or 1 year old prison. It's the same in every state and federal application to my knowledge.Agreed. But OP was saying there needs to be some time in the mix.The article clearly states that he faces jail time AND a fine, not OR a fine.
It needs to be prison time, otherwise it's just the cost of doing business.If the punishment is a fine, it's only illegal for poor people.Hence why all sentences are and/or. Fine of $100,000 and/or 1 year old prison. It's the same in every state and federal application to my knowledge.Agreed. But OP was saying there needs to be some time in the mix.The article clearly states that he faces jail time AND a fine, not OR a fine.
Hence why all sentences are and/or. Fine of $100,000 and/or 1 year old prison. It's the same in every state and federal application to my knowledge.Agreed. But OP was saying there needs to be some time in the mix.The article clearly states that he faces jail time AND a fine, not OR a fine.
It needs to be prison time, otherwise it's just the cost of doing business.
If the punishment is a fine, it's only illegal for poor people.
Hence why all sentences are and/or. Fine of $100,000 and/or 1 year old prison.
It's the same in every state and federal application to my knowledge.
Agreed. But OP was saying there needs to be some time in the mix.
The article clearly states that he faces jail time AND a fine, not OR a fine.