Raspberry Pi - Introducing: Raspberry Pi 5Gamma@programming.dev to Linux@lemmy.ml – 1065 points – 1 years agoraspberrypi.com266Post a CommentPreviewYou are viewing a single commentView all commentsNo nvme support? Oh come on. Still using microhdmi? OH COME ONApparently there's going to be an nvme HAT.Should have went with stock support from the get-go, tho. Why? Because nvme lasts ""forever"" and is ideal for servers.But that would increase the already quite high cost for all users, including those that don't necessarily need it. Don't get me wrong, I think the price is arleady too high and for the price I'd have expected more than a faster SoC, but here we are.You got a power button too /s1 more...I think f4om the comments on the blog it was that nvme would make the board too think, that's why they opted for a HAT1 more...1 more...1 more...
No nvme support? Oh come on. Still using microhdmi? OH COME ONApparently there's going to be an nvme HAT.Should have went with stock support from the get-go, tho. Why? Because nvme lasts ""forever"" and is ideal for servers.But that would increase the already quite high cost for all users, including those that don't necessarily need it. Don't get me wrong, I think the price is arleady too high and for the price I'd have expected more than a faster SoC, but here we are.You got a power button too /s1 more...I think f4om the comments on the blog it was that nvme would make the board too think, that's why they opted for a HAT1 more...1 more...1 more...
Apparently there's going to be an nvme HAT.Should have went with stock support from the get-go, tho. Why? Because nvme lasts ""forever"" and is ideal for servers.But that would increase the already quite high cost for all users, including those that don't necessarily need it. Don't get me wrong, I think the price is arleady too high and for the price I'd have expected more than a faster SoC, but here we are.You got a power button too /s1 more...I think f4om the comments on the blog it was that nvme would make the board too think, that's why they opted for a HAT1 more...1 more...
Should have went with stock support from the get-go, tho. Why? Because nvme lasts ""forever"" and is ideal for servers.But that would increase the already quite high cost for all users, including those that don't necessarily need it. Don't get me wrong, I think the price is arleady too high and for the price I'd have expected more than a faster SoC, but here we are.You got a power button too /s1 more...I think f4om the comments on the blog it was that nvme would make the board too think, that's why they opted for a HAT1 more...
But that would increase the already quite high cost for all users, including those that don't necessarily need it. Don't get me wrong, I think the price is arleady too high and for the price I'd have expected more than a faster SoC, but here we are.You got a power button too /s1 more...
I think f4om the comments on the blog it was that nvme would make the board too think, that's why they opted for a HAT
No nvme support? Oh come on. Still using microhdmi? OH COME ON
Apparently there's going to be an nvme HAT.
Should have went with stock support from the get-go, tho. Why? Because nvme lasts ""forever"" and is ideal for servers.
But that would increase the already quite high cost for all users, including those that don't necessarily need it.
Don't get me wrong, I think the price is arleady too high and for the price I'd have expected more than a faster SoC, but here we are.
You got a power button too /s
I think f4om the comments on the blog it was that nvme would make the board too think, that's why they opted for a HAT