ChatGPT users can now browse internet, OpenAI saysFlying Squid@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.world – 27 points – 1 years agomsn.com10Post a CommentPreviewYou are viewing a single commentView all commentsJoke's on them, I could already browse the internet.Of course the article sounds stupid, it's written by GPT too. It's freaking MSN. Two weeks ago, they published an article describing a recently deceased basketball player as having become "useless" now. That was a very "robot" point of view, I guess. It's a direct reprint of a Reuters article. Which you would have seen had you just looked.Apparently so. I saw the source was Reuters, but didn't see it was unedited. I wonder what's the excuse for the dumb title then.I mean it's not wrong. Except maybe fertiliser I guess. Probably good ai hasn't made that connection yet.Ok please enlighten us with the many uses for a dead basketball player. JkWe're in a time of great transition, lol
Joke's on them, I could already browse the internet.Of course the article sounds stupid, it's written by GPT too. It's freaking MSN. Two weeks ago, they published an article describing a recently deceased basketball player as having become "useless" now. That was a very "robot" point of view, I guess. It's a direct reprint of a Reuters article. Which you would have seen had you just looked.Apparently so. I saw the source was Reuters, but didn't see it was unedited. I wonder what's the excuse for the dumb title then.I mean it's not wrong. Except maybe fertiliser I guess. Probably good ai hasn't made that connection yet.Ok please enlighten us with the many uses for a dead basketball player. JkWe're in a time of great transition, lol
Of course the article sounds stupid, it's written by GPT too. It's freaking MSN. Two weeks ago, they published an article describing a recently deceased basketball player as having become "useless" now. That was a very "robot" point of view, I guess. It's a direct reprint of a Reuters article. Which you would have seen had you just looked.Apparently so. I saw the source was Reuters, but didn't see it was unedited. I wonder what's the excuse for the dumb title then.I mean it's not wrong. Except maybe fertiliser I guess. Probably good ai hasn't made that connection yet.Ok please enlighten us with the many uses for a dead basketball player. Jk
It's a direct reprint of a Reuters article. Which you would have seen had you just looked.Apparently so. I saw the source was Reuters, but didn't see it was unedited. I wonder what's the excuse for the dumb title then.
Apparently so. I saw the source was Reuters, but didn't see it was unedited. I wonder what's the excuse for the dumb title then.
I mean it's not wrong. Except maybe fertiliser I guess. Probably good ai hasn't made that connection yet.
Joke's on them, I could already browse the internet.
Of course the article sounds stupid, it's written by GPT too.
It's freaking MSN. Two weeks ago, they published an article describing a recently deceased basketball player as having become "useless" now.
That was a very "robot" point of view, I guess.
It's a direct reprint of a Reuters article. Which you would have seen had you just looked.
Apparently so.
I saw the source was Reuters, but didn't see it was unedited. I wonder what's the excuse for the dumb title then.
I mean it's not wrong. Except maybe fertiliser I guess.
Probably good ai hasn't made that connection yet.
Ok please enlighten us with the many uses for a dead basketball player.
Jk
We're in a time of great transition, lol