Microsoft Needs So Much Power to Train AI That It's Considering Small Nuclear ReactorsFlying Squid@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.world – 1113 points – 1 years agofuturism.com383Post a CommentPreviewYou are viewing a single commentView all commentsShow the parent commentNonsense, Microsoft will just put lots of PMs and Scrum masters on the task and they'll have a working reactor in 1 year max. /s, just in case any PMs are reading this and think it's totally reasonableEstimate is 10 years? OK let's 10x the workforce and get it done in 1Also, little known fact, 9 women can deliver one single baby in 1 month from conception!Can't argue with those numbers.
Nonsense, Microsoft will just put lots of PMs and Scrum masters on the task and they'll have a working reactor in 1 year max. /s, just in case any PMs are reading this and think it's totally reasonableEstimate is 10 years? OK let's 10x the workforce and get it done in 1Also, little known fact, 9 women can deliver one single baby in 1 month from conception!Can't argue with those numbers.
Estimate is 10 years? OK let's 10x the workforce and get it done in 1Also, little known fact, 9 women can deliver one single baby in 1 month from conception!Can't argue with those numbers.
Also, little known fact, 9 women can deliver one single baby in 1 month from conception!Can't argue with those numbers.
Nonsense, Microsoft will just put lots of PMs and Scrum masters on the task and they'll have a working reactor in 1 year max.
/s, just in case any PMs are reading this and think it's totally reasonable
Estimate is 10 years? OK let's 10x the workforce and get it done in 1
Also, little known fact, 9 women can deliver one single baby in 1 month from conception!
Can't argue with those numbers.