Nokia to cut as many as 14,000 jobs as profit drops by 69%Lee Duna@lemmy.nz to Technology@lemmy.world – 231 points – 9 months agomarketwatch.com44Post a CommentPreviewYou are viewing a single commentView all commentsOnly 31% profit instead of 100%? Outrageous!That's not how it worksLol yeah. 100% profit would mean literally no operating expenses. ^Most ^economically ^literate ^Lemmy ^user.I think he compared two years. You know…like the headline does.
Only 31% profit instead of 100%? Outrageous!That's not how it worksLol yeah. 100% profit would mean literally no operating expenses. ^Most ^economically ^literate ^Lemmy ^user.I think he compared two years. You know…like the headline does.
That's not how it worksLol yeah. 100% profit would mean literally no operating expenses. ^Most ^economically ^literate ^Lemmy ^user.I think he compared two years. You know…like the headline does.
Lol yeah. 100% profit would mean literally no operating expenses. ^Most ^economically ^literate ^Lemmy ^user.I think he compared two years. You know…like the headline does.
Only 31% profit instead of 100%? Outrageous!
That's not how it works
Lol yeah. 100% profit would mean literally no operating expenses.
^Most ^economically ^literate ^Lemmy ^user.
I think he compared two years. You know…like the headline does.