Christian photographer wins right to discriminate against LGBTQ+ couples
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/67529338-05d9-4184-9397-7f0f4eb5f0b7.jpeg)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/8f2046ae-5d2e-495f-b467-f7b14ccb4152.png)
![Christian photographer wins right to discriminate against LGBTQ+ couples](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/5b684c53-3108-403b-a361-2d6dca2f78dc.jpeg?format=jpg&thumbnail=256)
lgbtqnation.com
His win is a direct result of the Supreme Court's decision in a pivotal LGBTQ+ rights case.
You are viewing a single comment
His win is a direct result of the Supreme Court's decision in a pivotal LGBTQ+ rights case.
Does this in return mean that LGBTQ+ couples win the right to discriminate against christian photographers?
It would also likely mean that LGBTQ+ photographers won the right to discriminate against christians.
I would refuse to work at a Trumper wedding, so I'm glad we have the right to say no to that. That's the whole point of this ruling.
If this was a photographer of color refusing to work a klan wedding no one would be arguing that they shouldn't have been allowed to say no.
Well, they can, by just not choosing to hire one.
I think you might actually have just gotten the point here without knowing it. It's perfectly reasonable to pick a photographer who's not a bigot, just like how I would choose not to shoot photos for bigots.
You get how this works now?
Yes. For example, by not hiring him