Rule

LesDeuxBonsYeux@sh.itjust.works to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone – 957 points –
371

You are viewing a single comment

Literally every time you referenced the dictionary, you even got offended that I quoted the dictionary.

But sure, if the dictionary is right, how exactly am I wrong.

Show me one instance where I disagreed with the dictionary, Mr. "'Antwort' means 'answer', not 'response'".

You being a dingus for quoting the dictionary at me to explain an idiom that I've known and used for years in a language I've spoken on a daily basis since I can remember doesn't make me disagree with the dictionary.

So yeah... When did I disagree with any dictionary? Or rather: any translation/explanation of an idiom?

Ah so I'm not wrong then, took a bit for you to admit but I'm glad we got there.

Doing something for years doesn't mean you are doing it competently, you've never met an idiot who's done their job wrong for years?

Oh literally every time you tried to mock me for being wrong while not providing evidence or explanation. I typically call that being a crybaby but you're welcome to offer a different definition.

When did I ever claim you were wrong about that? Is that your hobby? Claiming people disagree with you while acting like the galaxy brain debate Champ?

Vaush, you really should be going on with your videos.

You've literally argued that I'm seeing about the idiom for well over a dozen comments. Your memory is apparently quite short.

Where? Show me a comment/quote.

https://douchebag.com/

I can provide links that don't change the substance of the argument as well.

Do you know what "sarcasm" is?

I do, I also know it doesn't actually change what you've said.

You say the idiom is not what the author themselves says it was, adding /s doesn't change that.

You say the idiom is not what the author themselves says it was

That's not what the comment you linked sad. I didn't say anything about the idiom itself.

It didn't say anything no, it implied I'm wrong and your translation is correct. It's that not the content of your comment?

14 more...
14 more...
14 more...
14 more...
14 more...
14 more...
14 more...
14 more...
14 more...
14 more...
14 more...
14 more...
14 more...